Panduit Corp. v. Corning Optical Communications ( 2019 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PANDUIT CORP., Appellant v. CORNING OPTICAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC, Appellee ______________________ 2018-1999 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017- 00009. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN J. MOLENDA, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT GREENFELD; KELLY J. EBERSPECHER, DANIEL STEVEN STRINGFIELD, Chicago, IL; KATHERINE DOROTHY CAPPAERT, Washington, DC. JOHN C. O'QUINN, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by HANNAH LAUREN BEDARD, JASON M. WILCOX; ERIC DAVID HAYES, Chicago, IL. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PLAGER, and O’MALLEY, Cir- cuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court