Carolyn Hughes v. Jo Anne Barnhart , 56 F. App'x 751 ( 2003 )


Menu:
  •                     United States Court of Appeals
    FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
    ___________
    No. 02-2131
    ___________
    Carolyn Hughes,                          *
    *
    Plaintiff - Appellant,      *
    * Appeal from the United States
    v.                                 * District Court for the
    * Northern District of Iowa.
    Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of *
    the Social Security Administration,      * [UNPUBLISHED]
    *
    Defendant - Appellee.       *
    ___________
    Submitted: December 11, 2002
    Filed: March 6, 2003
    ___________
    Before MCMILLIAN, GIBSON, and BYE, Circuit Judges.
    ___________
    PER CURIAM.
    Carolyn Hughes appeals the district court's1 decision affirming the
    Commissioner's denial of social security disability benefits. We affirm.
    1
    The Honorable John A. Jarvey, United States Magistrate Judge for the
    Northern District of Iowa, presiding by consent of the parties pursuant to 
    28 U.S.C. § 636
    (c).
    Hughes, born May 12, 1962, is a high school graduate with an associate of
    applied science degree from a medical assistant program. She has worked as an
    administrative clerk, accounting clerk, office clerk, nursing assistant, ward clerk and
    medical records clerk. On November 20, 1996, Hughes sustained a work-related low
    back injury and received medical treatment including, among other modalities,
    medications, physical therapy, an exercise program and a low back rehabilitation
    program. Hughes's medical records indicate that at times her pain and ability to
    function improved, while at other times she noted an increase in symptoms. Over
    time, Hughes developed diffuse persistent pain, leading to a diagnosis of fibromyalgia
    and chronic pain syndrom.
    Between November 20, 1996, and October 31, 1997, Hughes worked
    intermittently on a part-time basis. She supplemented her income by drawing on
    accrued leave, workers compensation, and unemployment benefits, and had a reported
    income for 1997 of $7,074.99. Despite encouragement from her treating physicians,
    who repeatedly recommended she continue to work within her limitations, Hughes
    did not work after November 1, 1997.
    On November 11, 1997, Hughes applied for social security disability benefits
    citing cirrhosis of the liver (non-alcoholic), chronic back pain resulting from a back
    injury, and fibromyalgia. The application was denied initially and also upon
    reconsideration. On April 5, 2000, a hearing was held before an administrative law
    judge (ALJ) who affirmed the denials. The ALJ determined Hughes was not eligible
    for disability benefits for the period between November 20, 1996, and October 31,
    1997, because she had engaged in substantial gainful activity between those dates.
    The ALJ discounted Hughes's testimony regarding the severity of her pain, and found
    she could no longer perform any of her past relevant work, but retained sufficient
    residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform other jobs that existed in significant
    numbers in the national economy. The Appeals Council denied further review, and
    the district court granted summary judgment to the Commissioner. On appeal to this
    -2-
    court, Hughes argues the ALJ erred by finding she had engaged in substantial gainful
    activity between November 20, 1996, and October 31, 1997. Hughes also argues the
    ALJ improperly discounted her pain complaints and the opinions of her treating
    physicians in determining she could perform other jobs that existed in significant
    numbers in the national economy.
    Our scope of review is narrow. "We will affirm the ALJ's findings if supported
    by substantial evidence on the record as a whole." Beckley v. Apfel, 
    152 F.3d 1056
    ,
    1059 (8th Cir. 1998). "Substantial evidence is less than a preponderance, but enough
    that a reasonable mind might accept it as adequate to support a decision." 
    Id.
     We
    find the decision is supported by substantial evidence and affirm for the reasons given
    by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
    A true copy.
    Attest:
    CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-2131

Citation Numbers: 56 F. App'x 751

Filed Date: 3/6/2003

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023