Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Watson Laboratories, Inc. , 426 F. App'x 905 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •           NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    muiteb ~tate% «ourt of §ppeaI%
    for tbe jfeberaI «ircuit
    DURAMED PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
    Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    WATSON LABORATORIES, INC.,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    2011-1438
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of Nevada in case no. 08-CV-0116, Judge Larry R.
    Hicks.
    ON MOTION
    Before LOURIE, LINN, AND DYK, Circuit Judges.
    LOURIE, Circuit Judge.
    ORDER
    Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Duramed) submits a
    motion for a temporary injunction to prevent Watson
    Laboratories, Inc. (Watson) from launching a generic
    version of its patented drug, pending disposition of its
    DURAMEDPHARMA v. WATSON LABS                              2
    appeal, and seeks an expedited briefing schedule. Watson
    opposes. Duramed replies.
    Rule 8(a)(1)(C)(2) of the Federal Rules of Appellate
    Procedure authorizes this court to grant an injunction
    pending appeaL Similar to a motion to stay a judgment or
    injunction pending appeal, which is authorized under this
    same rule, our determination is governed by four factors,
    the first two of which are the most critical: (1) whether
    the movant has made a strong showing of likelihood of
    success on the merits; (2) whether the movant will be
    irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of
    the stay will substantially injure the other parties inter-
    ested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest
    lies. Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.s. 770, 776 (1987).
    Without prejudicing the ultimate disposition of this
    case by a merits panel, we conclude based upon the pa-
    pers submitted that Duramed has not established that it
    is entitled to the extraordinary relief of a • temporary
    injunction pending this appeaL
    Accordingly,
    IT Is ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion for a temporary injunction is denied.
    (2) The motion for expedited briefing is granted.
    Duramed's opening brief shall be filed within seven days
    of the issuance of this order. Watson's brief shall be due
    fourteen days after the filing of Duramed's opening brief.
    Duramed's reply brief and the joint appendix shall be due
    seven days after the filing of Watson's brief.
    3                        DURAMEDPHARMA V. WATSON LABS
    FOR THE COURT
    JUL 272011                 lsI Jan Horbaly
    Date                   Jan Horbaly
    Clerk
    cc: Vernon M. Winters, Esq.
    Mark T. Jansen, Esq.
    s23                                      couJ~~~~P£ALS
    I.S.                 FOR
    THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT
    JUL 272011
    JANHORBAlY
    ClEAK
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2011-1438

Citation Numbers: 426 F. App'x 905

Judges: Dyk, Linn, Lourie

Filed Date: 7/27/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/5/2023