Carpenter v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs , 424 F. App'x 954 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • NOTE: This order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of AppeaIs
    for the Federal Circuit
    LEWIS CARPENTER,
    Claimant-Appellant,
    V.
    ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS
    AFFAIRS, `
    Resp0n,dent~Appellee.
    2010~7I34
    Appeal from the United States C0urt of Appea1s for
    Veterans C1aims in case n0. 10-1266, Judge Kenneth B.
    Kran1er.
    ON MOTION
    Before RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and O'MALLEY,
    Circuit Judges.
    RADER, Chief Judge.
    0 R D E R
    CARPENTER V. DVA 2
    The appellant moves without opposition to vacate the
    judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for Veter-
    ans Claims and to remand for further proceedings.
    The appellant filed a notice of appeal with the Court
    of Veterans Claims more than 120 days after the Board of
    Veterans’ Appeals mailed its decision in his case. That
    court dismissed the appeal as untimely, concluding that
    the 120-day appeal period established by 
    38 U.S.C. § 7266
    (a) for seeking review of Board of Veterans’ Appeals
    decisions is jurisdictional and not subject to equitable
    tolling. The appellant sought this court's review.
    This court stayed the briefing schedule in this appeal
    pending the United States Supreme Court’s review of~our
    decision in Henderson o. Shinseki, 
    589 F.3d 1201
     (Fed.
    Cir. 2009) (en banc) (affirming Court of Appeals_ for Vet-
    erans Claims determination that period to appeal to that
    court is not subject to equitable tolling). in H§nderson, ex
    rel. Henderson o. Shinseki, 
    131 S.Ct. 1197
     (2011), the
    Supreme Court reversed this court’s decision and con-
    cluded that the 120-day deadline for filing an appeal with
    the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims does not have
    jurisdictional consequences Because the Court of Ap-
    peals for Veterans Clai1ns erred in concluding that the
    appeal deadline established by § 7 266(a) is jurisdictional,
    we vacate the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims’
    judgment and remand for further proceedings.
    Accordingly,
    IT ls ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted The judgment is vacated
    and the case is remanded for further proceedings
    (2) All sides shall bear their own costs.
    3
    CARPENTER V. DVA
    FoR THE CoUR'r
    2 5  lsi J an Horbaly
    Date J an Horbaly
    cc: George E. Quillin, Esq.
    Tara K. Hogan, Esq.
    s20
    Clerk
    issued As A Mandate:  2 5
    F¢l.ED
    l|.8 RT FOR
    i‘Elg¥EnE91i:niPr:P1?éLdn
    HAY 2 5 2011
    . _.|N'|HD|DAl¥
    _C|.BI(
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2010-7134

Citation Numbers: 424 F. App'x 954

Judges: Lourie, O'Malley, Rader

Filed Date: 5/25/2011

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 8/3/2023