Authenex, Inc. v. EMC Corp. , 425 F. App'x 901 ( 2011 )


Menu:
  • ORDER

    PER CURIAM.

    Authenex, Inc. responds to this court’s order directing it to show cause why its appeal in 2011-1264 should not be dismissed as premature.

    Appeal 2011-1264 was filed after the district court granted summary judgment of noninfringement but before the district court entered a final judgment or ruled on pending counterclaims of noninfringement and invalidity. Authenex states that the district court recently filed a final judg*902ment resolving all claims in the case and Authenex filed another appeal, 2011-1398, seeking review of the final judgment.

    Accordingly,

    It Is Ordered That:

    (1) Appeal 2011-1264 is dismissed as premature.

    (2) Authenex’s opening brief in 2011-1398 is due within 30 days of the date of filing of this order.

Document Info

Docket Number: Nos. 2011-1264, 2011-1398

Citation Numbers: 425 F. App'x 901

Filed Date: 7/7/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 11/4/2022