In Re: The Procter & Gamble Company ( 2016 )

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, Appellant ______________________ 2015-1680 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00505. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by CALVIN P. GRIFFITH, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, Cleveland, OH; STEVEN W. MILLER, The Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH. JOSEPH GERARD PICCOLO, Office of the Solicitor, Unit- ed States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, HUGHES, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court