Aventis Pharma S.A. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. ( 2012 )


Menu:
  • NOTE; This order is nonprecedential
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    AVENTIS PHARMA S.A. AND SANOFI-AVENTIS
    U.S., LLC,
    Plczintiffs-Appellants,
    V.
    SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. AND
    SUN PHARMA GLOBAL FZE,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    2011-1095
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    District of Delaware in case no. 09-0\7-0630, Chief Judge
    Gregory M. Sleet.
    ON MOTION
    Before LOURIE, SCHALL and DYK, Circuic Ju,dges.
    LOURIE, Circuit Ju,dge.
    0 R D E R
    The court construes Aventis Pharma S.A. and Sanofi-
    Aventis U.S., LLC ("Aventis”)’s response to this court’s
    February 4, 2011 order as an unopposed motion to lift the
    AVENTIS PHA.RMA V. SUN PHA.RMA 2
    stay and summarily affirm the judgment of the United
    States District Court for the District of Delaware.
    This appeal arises out of a complaint filed by Aventis
    in the district court alleging infringement of U.S. Patent
    Nos. 5,714,512]31 and 5,750,561. ln a related case,
    Aoentis Pharma S.A. v. Hospira, Inc., 07-CV-O'721 (D. Del.
    2010) (Hospira), the district court found that the same
    patent claims asserted in this case were invalid and
    unenforceable due to inequitable conduct. In light of
    Hospira, the district court entered final judgment in this
    case against Aventis, and Aventis appealed to this court.
    This court stayed proceedings pending final disposition of
    Hospira.
    ' On April 9, 2012, this court affirmed the district
    court’s judgment in Hospira. See Auentis Pharma S.A. u.
    Hosprlra, Inc., 675 F.Bd 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2012). In light of
    this court’s decision in Hospira, Aventis concedes that the
    district oourt’s judgment in this case should be consistent
    with Hospira.
    Accordingly,
    IT Is ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion is granted. The stay is lifted and the
    judgment of the district court is affirmed
    (2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    (3) All pending motions are moot.
    FOR THE COURT
    l 2
    0  /s/ J an Horbaly
    Date J an Horbaly
    Clerk
    s»a“dl'§§dst.-:°“
    AUG 07 2012
    JAN HUHBALV
    CLEHK
    3 ` AVENTIS PHARMA v. sANr)oz
    cc: George F. Pappas, Esq.
    Robert B. Breisblatt, Esq.
    325
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 2011-1095

Filed Date: 8/7/2012

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021