Roberts v. Studio 15 Management ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-1453    Document: 7      Page: 1   Filed: 06/08/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    TINA LOUISE ROBERTS,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT, RUTH RIVERIA,
    JOVANNA Q.,
    Defendants-Appellees
    ______________________
    2023-1453
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    Southern District of California in No. 3:22-cv-00967-GPC-
    AHG, Judge Gonzalo P. Curiel.
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    Having received no response to the court’s February 21,
    2023, order to show cause, we now transfer.
    Tina Louise Roberts filed the operative complaint in
    the United States District Court for the Southern District
    of California, appearing to assert claims regarding torts
    and civil rights violations against private defendants, seek-
    ing $500,000.00 in damages. The district court dismissed
    Case: 23-1453      Document: 7    Page: 2    Filed: 06/08/2023
    2                          ROBERTS   v. STUDIO 15 MANAGEMENT
    the complaint, and Ms. Roberts filed a notice of appeal ad-
    dressed to this court.
    This appeal does not fall within the limited authority
    that Congress granted this court to review decisions of fed-
    eral district courts under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    (a). That juris-
    diction extends only to cases arising under the patent laws,
    see 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    (a)(1); civil actions on review to the dis-
    trict court from the United States Patent and Trademark
    Office, see § 1295(a)(4)(C); or certain damages claims
    against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in
    amount,” 
    28 U.S.C. § 1346
    (a)(2), see 
    28 U.S.C. § 1295
    (a)(2).
    This case does not fall within that limited jurisdiction. We
    thus transfer this appeal to United States Court of Appeals
    for the Ninth Circuit. See 
    28 U.S.C. § 1631
    . *
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    This appeal and all transmittals are transferred to the
    United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
    FOR THE COURT
    June 8, 2023                            /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
    Date                                Jarrett B. Perlow
    Acting Clerk of Court
    *   Ms. Roberts’ notice of appeal also lists the case
    number of a matter Ms. Roberts appears to have filed in
    the Superior Court for the State of California and includes
    attachments of what appear to be documents filed in that
    case and others in California state courts. This court does
    not have appellate jurisdiction over state courts and lacks
    the ability to transfer cases to such courts under § 1631.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-1453

Filed Date: 6/8/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2023