Jolley v. Hud ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 22-2061    Document: 31     Page: 1    Filed: 06/07/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    WILLIAM B. JOLLEY,
    Petitioner
    v.
    DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
    DEVELOPMENT,
    Respondent
    ______________________
    2022-2061
    ______________________
    Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection
    Board in Nos. SF-0752-13-0583-M-1 and SF-0752-14-0286-
    M-1.
    ______________________
    ON MOTION
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    The Department of Housing and Urban Development
    (“HUD”) moves to waive Federal Circuit Rule 27(f) and dis-
    miss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. William B. Jolley
    opposes and moves for sanctions against HUD and for sum-
    mary disposition in his favor. For the following reasons,
    we grant HUD’s motion and dismiss.
    Case: 22-2061     Document: 31      Page: 2    Filed: 06/07/2023
    2                                               JOLLEY   v. HUD
    “[A] petition to review a final order or final decision of
    the [Merit Systems Protection] Board shall be filed in the
    United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Cir-
    cuit . . . within 60 days after the Board issues notice of the
    final order or decision.” 
    5 U.S.C. § 7703
    (b)(1)(A). This re-
    quirement is “mandatory and jurisdictional,” and thus can-
    not be waived or equitably tolled. Fedora v. Merit Sys. Prot.
    Bd., 
    848 F.3d 1013
    , 1016 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (citation omitted).
    To be timely, the petition must actually be received by the
    court on or before this deadline, not just timely mailed. Id.;
    see Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A).
    Here, the Board issued notice of its final decision on
    May 20, 2022, ECF No. 2 at 52, and the court received
    Mr. Jolley’s petition on Wednesday, July 20, 2022 (61 days
    later), ECF No. 1-2 at 1 (stamped receipt date). Mr. Jolley
    provides a United States Postal Service receipt indicating
    that he mailed his petition on July 13, 2022 (54 days after
    the notice), but as noted above, that does not constitute “fil-
    ing” with the court. Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A). Nor is that
    receipt’s “Estimated Delivery Date” of July 18, 2022
    (59 days after the notice), ECF No. 26 at 14 (emphasis
    added), sufficient to show actual delivery of the petition to
    the court any earlier than the stamped date of
    July 20, 2022.
    Accordingly,
    Case: 22-2061      Document: 31   Page: 3   Filed: 06/07/2023
    JOLLEY   v. HUD                                          3
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The motion to dismiss is granted. The petition for
    review is dismissed.
    (2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
    (3) Any other pending motion is denied.
    FOR THE COURT
    June 7, 2023                       /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
    Date                           Jarrett B. Perlow
    Acting Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 22-2061

Filed Date: 6/7/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/21/2023