Lomax v. Capital Rental Agency, Inc. ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Case: 23-1458    Document: 12     Page: 1   Filed: 06/08/2023
    NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
    United States Court of Appeals
    for the Federal Circuit
    ______________________
    MATTIE LOMAX,
    Plaintiff-Appellant
    v.
    CAPITAL RENTAL AGENCY, INC., AMERICAN
    INVESTMENT SERVICES, GREGORY
    SCHWEITZER, MYRNA B. PALLEY,
    Defendants-Appellees
    ______________________
    2023-1458
    ______________________
    Appeal from the United States District Court for the
    Southern District of Florida in No. 1:09-cv-21347-RLR,
    Judge Robin L. Rosenberg.
    ______________________
    ON MOTION
    ______________________
    PER CURIAM.
    ORDER
    Mattie Lomax moves for “entry of default,” ECF No. 7
    at 1; responds to the court’s March 23, 2023, show cause
    order, ECF No. 8; and seeks “leave to amend [her] exhibit
    list and to admit into evidence certain additional [exhib-
    its],” ECF No. 9 at 1. Appellees move for an extension of
    Case: 23-1458     Document: 12      Page: 2    Filed: 06/08/2023
    2                      LOMAX   v. CAPITAL RENTAL AGENCY, INC.
    time to respond to the court’s March 23, 2023, order, which
    Ms. Lomax moves to strike. The court dismisses this ap-
    peal.
    In May 2009, Ms. Lomax filed a notice of removal from
    state court for her action alleging violation of landlord ob-
    ligations and retaliatory practices. The United States Dis-
    trict Court for the Southern District of Florida remanded
    the case to state court on May 20, 2009, and denied Ms.
    Lomax’s motion for reconsideration on February 17, 2010.
    Ms. Lomax filed a notice of appeal on January 24, 2023,
    seeking review of the remand order.
    “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case
    is a jurisdictional requirement,” Bowles v. Russell, 
    551 U.S. 205
    , 214 (2007), and, in order to be timely, a notice of ap-
    peal must generally be filed within 30 days after entry of
    final judgment, 
    28 U.S.C. § 2107
    (a); Fed. R. App. P.
    4(a)(1)(A). Here, Ms. Lomax filed her notice more than 13
    years after the district court’s remand order. At least be-
    cause of this untimeliness, we lack jurisdiction over the ap-
    peal, and we cannot transfer under 
    28 U.S.C. § 1631
    .
    Accordingly,
    IT IS ORDERED THAT:
    (1) The appeal is dismissed.
    (2) All pending motions are denied as moot.
    (3) Each side shall bear its own costs.
    FOR THE COURT
    June 8, 2023                           /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow
    Date                                Jarrett B. Perlow
    Acting Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 23-1458

Filed Date: 6/8/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 6/8/2023