Shaquille Javate Ashton v. State ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 3, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NO. 14-15-00482-CR
    SHAQUILLE JAVATE ASHTON, Appellant
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
    On Appeal from the 184th District Court
    Harris County, Texas
    Trial Court Cause No. 1433648
    MEMORANDUM                     OPINION
    Appellant appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery with a deadly
    weapon. Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the
    appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation
    of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.
    See High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    , 811–13 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).
    A copy of counsel’s brief and the record was delivered to appellant.
    Appellant was advised of the right to file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State,
    
    813 S.W.2d 503
    , 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). As of this date, more than 60 days
    have passed, and no pro se response has been filed.
    We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief carefully and agree the
    appeals is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error
    in the record. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders
    brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds
    for review. See Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
    Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Wise
    Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00482-CR

Filed Date: 12/3/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016