Smith v. Raven Hocking Coal ( 1998 )

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2742 DEAN W. SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RAVEN HOCKING COAL CORPORATION, an Ohio corpo- ration; WAMPUM HARDWARE COMPANY, a Pennsyl- vania corporation; MACK ENERGY COMPANY, an Ohio corporation; EASTERN KENTUCKY EXPLOSIVES, a Kentucky corporation, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Huntington. Charles H. Haden II, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-738-3) Submitted: March 26, 1998 Decided: April 6, 1998 Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dean W. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Randall Lee Trautwein, LAMP, O'DELL, BARTRAM, ENTSMINGER, LEVY & TRAUTWEIN, P.L.L.C., Hunting- ton, West Virginia; John Tyler Dinsmore, FLAHERTY, SENSABAUGH & BONASSO, Charleston, West Virginia; Barry Michael Taylor, JENKINS FENSTERMAKER, P.L.L.C., Huntington, West Virginia; Edward Martin Kowal, Jr., CAMPBELL, WOODS, BAGLEY, EMERSON, MCNEER & HERNDON, Huntington, West Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appel- lant's requests to reverse the decision of the Supreme Court of West Virginia and to remand the action to the Circuit Court of Mason County, West Virginia. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's report and recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Raven Hocking Coal Corp., No. CA-97-738-3 (S.D.W. Va. Nov. 5, 1997). Additionally, we deny Appellees' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate- rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2