In re Michael J. CA4/1 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Filed 4/1/15 In re Michael J. CA4/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    In re MICHAEL J., a Person Coming
    Under the Juvenile Court Law.
    D066278
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                               (Super. Ct. No. J231394)
    v.
    MICHAEL J.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Robert
    Longstreth and Aaron H. Katz, Judges. Affirmed.
    Johanna S. Schiavoni, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant
    and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    An amended petition alleged minor Michael J. came within the provisions of
    Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 because it alleged Michael attempted to steal
    personal property, by mean of force and fear, from Deyanira G. (in violation of Pen.
    Code, §§ 211/664),1 and assaulted her with force likely to cause great bodily injury (in
    violation of § 245, subd. (a)(4)), and assaulted another person with force likely to cause
    great bodily injury (in violation of § 245, subd. (a)(4)). Michael moved to suppress the
    evidence against him, alleging it was the fruit of an unlawful detention. After that motion
    was denied, the parties agreed to a disposition. Under the agreement, the prosecution
    filed an amended petition alleging only two counts—that Michael attempted to steal
    personal property, by mean of force and fear, from Deyanira G. (in violation of
    §§ 211/664), and Michael stole the property (in violation of § 487, subd. (c))—and
    Michael agreed to admit the count alleging violation of section 487, subdivision (c), in
    exchange for dismissal of the count alleging violation of section 211/664. The court,
    after determining Michael's waiver of his rights was knowing and voluntary and his
    admission to the factual basis for the plea was free and voluntary, sustained the petition,
    continued Michael as a ward of the court, and dismissed count one. The court also
    adopted the fast track recommendations and ordered Michael be detained in juvenile hall
    as part of the Breaking Cycles program for a maximum of 240 days. Thereafter, in an ex
    parte minute order, the court determined the overall maximum term of confinement was
    five years two months, and ordered all prior orders not in conflict remain in full force and
    effect.
    1         All statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.
    2
    Michael filed a notice of appeal from the denial of his motion to suppress evidence
    and the jurisdictional findings. We affirm.
    FACTS
    On May 22, 2014, Michael unlawfully stole and took personal property from
    Deyanira G.
    DISCUSSION
    Appointed appellate counsel has filed a brief summarizing the proceedings below.
    Counsel presents no argument for reversal, but asks this court to review the record for
    error as mandated by People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     and Anders v. California
    (1967) 
    386 U.S. 738
    . Counsel has identified as possible issues: (1) whether the trial court
    erred in finding Michael was not unlawfully detained and therefore erred when it denied
    his motion to suppress the evidence against him; (2) whether Michael's custody credits
    were properly calculated; (3) whether the trial court properly calculated the maximum
    term of confinement; and (4) whether the probation conditions imposed on Michael were
    unconstitutionally vague or overbroad.
    We granted Michael permission to file a supplemental brief on his own behalf, but
    he has not responded. A review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
     and Anders v. California, 
    supra,
     
    386 U.S. 738
     has disclosed no reasonably
    arguable appellate issues. Michael has been competently represented by counsel on this
    appeal.
    3
    DISPOSITION
    The orders are affirmed.
    McDONALD, J.
    WE CONCUR:
    HUFFMAN, Acting P. J.
    IRION, J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: D066278

Filed Date: 4/1/2015

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/1/2015