in Re Zak Nakhoda, James Wesselski, Kenneth Chambers, Philip Spotts, the Structural Alliance, Wesgroup Consulting, LLC, and the Mission Group ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                     ACCEPTED
    01-15-00695-CV
    FIRST COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    11/5/2015 4:28:19 PM
    CHRISTOPHER PRINE
    CLERK
    No. 01-15-00695-CV
    FILED IN
    IN THE COURT OF APPEALS                  1st COURT OF APPEALS
    HOUSTON, TEXAS
    FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    11/5/2015 4:28:19 PM
    CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
    Clerk
    IN RE ZAK NAKHODA, JAMES WESSELSKI, KENNETH CHAMBERS, PHILIP
    SPOTTS, THE STRUCTURAL ALLIANCE, WESGROUP CONSULTING, LLC, AND THE
    MISSION GROUP,
    Relators.
    Original Mandamus Proceeding from the
    80th District Court, Harris County, Texas;
    Rankin Road, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds of London, Gulf Coast Claims Service, Pat
    Donovan, and John Andres
    Trial Court Cause 2010-25885
    RELATORS’ AGREED MOTION TO DISMISS MANDAMUS AS MOOT
    TO THE HONORABLE COURT:
    Relators Zak Nakhoda, James Wesselski, Kenneth Chambers, Philip Spotts,
    The Structural Alliance, Wesgroup Consulting, LLC, and The Mission Group
    (“Relators”) initiated this mandamus proceeding to seek review of Judge Larry
    Weiman’s August 12, 2015 order compelling production of seven years of 1099s
    and W-2s showing income received by Relators from counsel for Rankin Road, a
    party in the underlying lawsuit.
    The Court stayed enforcement of that order pending review of Relators’
    Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and directed Real Parties in Interest to file their
    Response to Relators’ Petition on or before September 4, 2015. Real Parties in
    1
    Interest then moved for, and the Court granted, an extension of the response
    deadline.
    On August 25, 2015, Judge Weiman recused himself from the underlying
    proceeding. The case was re-assigned to The Honorable Debra Ibarra Mayfield. The
    Court then abated this proceeding until September 25, 2015 to allow Judge Mayfield
    to reconsider the August 12th order. The Court directed the trial court to file a
    supplemental clerk’s record containing any order issued by Judge Mayfield with
    respect to her reconsideration of the August 12th order.
    Judge Mayfield heard arguments of counsel on September 21, 2015, but did
    not issue a ruling. She subsequently requested that Relators’ counsel issue a notice
    of hearing for October 19, 2015. The parties then filed an Agreed Motion to Extend
    Abatement, which the Court granted, extending the abatement period to October 20,
    2015.
    Judge Mayfield heard additional argument on October 19, 2015, and advised
    the parties that she would issue a ruling on or before October 30, 2015. On the
    parties’ motion, the Court again extended the abatement period to November 6,
    2015.
    On October 29, 2015, Judge Mayfield issued an order granting the motion for
    protection and quashing the depositions on written question and discovery
    subpoenas directed to Relators. Order, Oct. 29, 2015 (attached as Exhibit A). On
    2
    November 5, 2015, Relators requested that the trial court clerk file a supplemental
    clerk’s record containing Judge Mayfield’s order, in compliance with this Court’s
    directive.
    In its mandamus petition, Relators requested an order compelling the trial
    court to vacate the August 12, 2015 order requiring production of the documents and
    granting Relators’ motion for protection. With that relief having been granted by
    Judge Mayfield, it now appears this mandamus proceeding is moot and should be
    dismissed. See In re Gonzales, 03-12-00611-CV, 
    2013 WL 238736
    , at *1 (Tex.
    App.—Austin Jan. 17, 2013, orig. proceeding); In re Luna, 
    317 S.W.3d 484
    , 484
    (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2010, orig. proceeding). Relators therefore request that the
    Court lift its abatement and dismiss this mandamus proceeding. All costs in the
    appellate courts will be borne by the party incurring them.
    PRAYER
    Relators, Zak Nakhoda, James Wesselski, Kenneth Chambers, Philip Spotts,
    The Structural Alliance, Wesgroup Consulting, LLC, and The Mission Group,
    request that the Court lift its abatement and dismiss this mandamus action without
    prejudice. Relators further pray for any other relief to which they are entitled.
    3
    Respectfully Submitted,
    FOGLER, BRAR, FORD,
    O’NEIL & GRAY LLP
    By: /s/ Murray Fogler
    Murray Fogler
    State Bar No. 07207300
    mfogler@beckredden.com
    Jas Brar
    State Bar No. 24059483
    Robin O’Neil
    State Bar No. 24079075
    711 Louisiana, Suite 500
    Pennzoil Place, South Tower
    Houston, Texas 77002
    (713) 481-1010
    (713) 574-3224 (Fax)
    ATTORNEYS FOR RELATORS
    4
    CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
    Counsel for Relators has conferred with counsel for Real Parties in Interest
    and they are unopposed to this motion.
    /s/ Robin O’Neil
    Robin O’Neil
    5
    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
    I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was properly
    forwarded to counsel of record for the Real Parties in Interest in accordance with Rule
    9.5 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on the 5th day of November 2015, as
    follows:
    Counsel for Real Parties in Interest:
    Ms. Tamara M. Madden
    Mr. Casey T. Wallace
    JOHNSON, TRENT,
    WEST & TAYLOR, LLP
    919 Milam Street, Suite 1700
    Houston, Texas 77002
    Ronald E. Tigner
    Gregory S. Hudson
    COZEN & O’CONNOR
    1221 McKinney Suite 2900
    Houston, Texas 77010
    (832) 214-3900
    (832) 214-3905 (fax)
    Respondent:
    The Honorable Larry Weiman
    80th Judicial District Court
    201 Caroline, 9th Floor
    Houston, Texas 77002
    713-368-6100
    /s/ Robin O’Neil
    Robin O’Neil
    6
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 01-15-00695-CV

Filed Date: 11/5/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016