Miller, Demontrell ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                                          WR-81,581-01
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    AUSTIN, TEXAS
    Transmitted 6/5/2015 8:10:09 AM
    Accepted 6/5/2015 9:06:00 AM
    Texas Board of Legal Specialization
    ABEL
    Criminal Law     ACOSTA
    (1991)
    Criminal Appellate Law (2011)CLERK
    RECEIVED
    COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    6/5/2015
    ABEL ACOSTA, CLERK
    To: Hon. Abel Acosta
    Date: June 5, 2015
    Subject: Ex parte Demontrell Miller; No. WR-81,581-01
    Dear Mr. Acosta:
    I have received notice that, on May 20, 2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals denied the Applicant’s motion
    for rehearing / reconsideration in the above captioned case. Pursuant to Article 11.071 section 2 (e), I have
    caused a motion to be filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division,
    a motion requesting the appointing of counsel to represent Mr. Miller in a habeas corpus proceeding under 28
    USC 2254, in federal court. A copy of that motion is attached. and I have
    Certificate of Compliance and Delivery
    This is to certify that: (1) this document, created using WordPerfect™ X7 software, contains 112 words, excluding
    those items permitted by Rule 9.4 (i)(1), Tex.R.App.Pro., and complies with Rules 9.4 (i)(2)(B) and 9.4 (i)(3),
    Tex.R.App.Pro.; and (2) on June 5, 2015, a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing memo was
    transmitted via the eService function on the State’s eFiling portal, to Michael J. West (mwest@smith-
    county.com), counsel of record for the State of Texas.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ____________________________________
    David A. Schulman
    Attorney at Law
    1801 East 51st Street, Suite 365-474
    Austin, Texas 78723
    Tel. 512-474-4747
    Fax: 512-532-6282
    eMail: zdrdavida@davidschulman.com
    State Bar Card No. 17833400
    Case 6:15-cv-00535 Document 1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    TYLER DIVISION
    Demontrell Lamar Miller                      §
    Petitioner                                   §
    §
    vs.                                          §        No. ________________
    §        Capital Case
    William Stephens, Director                   §
    TDCJ-CID                                     §
    Motion for Appointment of Counsel
    IN FORMA PAUPERIS
    TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
    COMES NOW, Demontrell Lamar Miller (“Petitioner”), by and
    through David A. Schulman, his current court-appointed lawyer
    (“Movant”), and respectfully requests that new counsel be
    appointed, pursuant to 18 USC § 3599(a)(2), to represent him in
    a habeas corpus proceeding under 28 USC § 2254. In support of
    this request, Petitioner sets forth the following:
    I
    Petitioner was charged by indictment with the offense of
    capital murder, upon which the State sought the imposition of the
    death penalty.        On his plea of “Not Guilty,” Petitioner was
    convicted by a jury and a death sentence was imposed. This
    Case 6:15-cv-00535 Document 1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 2 of 5 PageID #: 2
    conviction was affirmed on direct appeal. Miller v. State, No.
    AP-76,270 (Tex.Cr.App. May 23, 2012).
    Following trial, Petitioner was deemed an indigent in state
    district court, and his first application for post-conviction writ of
    habeas corpus under Article 11.071, V.A.C.C.P. was timely filed,
    by the undersigned counsel, on January 6, 2012. On April 15,
    2015, the Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas denied habeas
    corpus relief. See Ex parte Miller, No. WR-81,581-01 (Tex.Cr.App.
    April 15, 2015). Motion for rehearing was denied on May 20,
    2015.
    II
    Petitioner is entitled to appointment of counsel pursuant to
    18 USC § 3599(a)(2).           He has proceeded as an indigent, with
    appointed counsel, throughout state court proceedings.                         He
    remains indigent, and has never had his constitutional claims for
    relief addressed by a federal court. He is, therefore, entitled to the
    assistance of counsel in order to present those claims. See
    McFarland v. Scott, 
    512 U.S. 849
    , 857-858 (1998).
    2
    Case 6:15-cv-00535 Document 1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 3 of 5 PageID #: 3
    III
    Undersigned counsel does not seek appointment, because he
    represented Petitioner in the state habeas corpus proceedings.
    Under Martinez v. Ryan, No. 10-1001 (March 20, 2012), Trevino
    v. Thaler, No. 11-10189 (February 25, 2013), and Christeson v.
    Roper, No. 14-6873 (January 20, 2015), Petitioner has the right
    to raise as cause for a procedural default any ineffective assistance
    by undersigned counsel in raising or failing to raise in state
    habeas corpus proceedings claims of trial counsel's ineffectiveness.
    For this reason, undersigned counsel might be conflicted and
    should not represent Petitioner in federal habeas corpus
    proceedings.
    IV
    The Texas Habeas Assistance and Training (“TX HAT”) project,
    established by the Defender Services Committee of the Judicial
    Conference to consult with and assist counsel appointed in capital
    2254 cases in Texas, has been attempting to recruit qualified,
    knowledgeable      counsel      to   recommend         to    the    Court    for
    appointment. Working their own contacts and with the American
    Bar Association's Capital Post-Conviction Representation Project,
    they are continuing to search for counsel.                  This motion for
    3
    Case 6:15-cv-00535 Document 1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 4 of 5 PageID #: 4
    appointment has been deferred in the hope that such efforts would
    yield a recommendation.           No one has yet agreed to take the
    appointment, however, so the motion has been filed. Richard Burr
    of TX HAT (dick@burrandwelch.com, 713-628-3391) is the point
    person on TX HAT's continuing efforts to find counsel for
    Petitioner and will inform the Court of any person or firm willing
    and able to take the appointment.
    Prayer
    WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movant respectfully
    requests that the Court appoint new counsel to represent
    Petitioner in his habeas corpus proceeding under 28 USC § 2254.
    Respectfully submitted,
    ____________________________________
    David A. Schulman
    Attorney at Law
    1801 East 51st Street, Suite 365474
    Austin, Texas 78723
    Tel. 512-474-4747
    Fax: 512-532-6282
    eMail: zdrdavida@davidschulman.com
    State Bar Card No. 17833400
    Attorney for Demontrell Lamar Miller
    4
    Case 6:15-cv-00535 Document 1 Filed 06/04/15 Page 5 of 5 PageID #: 5
    Certificate of Delivery
    This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the above and
    foregoing Motion for Appointment of Counsel has been or will be
    hand-delivered, mailed postage prepaid, or transmitted via
    telecopier, or a portable document format computer document will
    be transmitted via eMail, to the office of the Attorney General of
    Texas, Capital Litigation Division, Attention: Katherine Hayes
    (katherine_hayes@oag.state.tx.us), on June 4, 2015.
    ______________________________________
    David A. Schulman
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-81,581-01

Filed Date: 6/5/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016