Mitchell-Smith, Jevante Trevion ( 2015 )


Menu:
  •               IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. WR-82,242-01
    EX PARTE JEVANTE TREVION MITCHELL-SMITH, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 1374104 IN THE 230TH DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HARRIS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant originally pleaded guilty to
    aggravated robbery in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. He was later
    adjudicated guilty and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. Although Applicant explicitly
    waived his right to appeal from the adjudication, he did file a motion for reconsideration, which the
    trial court treated as a motion for new trial. The trial court set the motion for a hearing, but through
    no fault of his own, Applicant was not bench-warranted, and the hearing was not conducted until
    2
    after the motion for new trial had been overruled by operation of law.
    Applicant contends, among other things,1 that he was denied due process when he was unable
    to present evidence in support of the motion for new trial before it was overruled by operation of
    law. We remanded this application to the trial court for findings of fact and conclusions of law.
    Before remand, the trial court entered findings of fact and conclusions of law, recommending
    that relief be granted on the basis that Applicant was denied due process. We find that Applicant
    is entitled to the opportunity a hearing on his timely-filed motion for new trial after adjudication in
    Cause No. 1374104 from the 230th District Court of Harris County. Applicant is ordered returned
    to that time at which the trial court has jurisdiction to consider the motion for new trial, and to
    conduct a hearing on that motion if necessary. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the
    trial court shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be
    represented by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant
    for the motion for new trial. All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed
    on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to have
    the trial court consider his motion for new trial, he must take affirmative steps to request a hearing
    on the motion for new trial within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.
    Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional
    Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.
    Delivered: October 14, 2015
    Do not publish
    1
    This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: WR-82,242-01

Filed Date: 10/14/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/14/2015