Hubbard v. Roach ( 2017 )


Menu:
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT F 2017
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JUN 2 6,.
    Clerk, U.S. D\strict & Bankruvi€y
    Lisa Hubbard, ) courts for the Dlstrict ot Columbla
    Plaintiff, §
    v. § Civil Action No. 17-1210 (UNA)
    Marquita Peoples Roach et al., §
    v Defendants. §
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and
    application for leave to proceed informal pauperis. The Court Will grant the application and
    dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3)
    (requiring the court to dismiss an action “at any time” if it determines that subject matter
    jurisdiction is Wanting).
    The subject matter jurisdiction of the lfederal district courts is limited and is set forth
    generally at 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Under those statutes, federal jurisdiction is available
    only When a “federal question” is presented or the parties are of diverse citizenship and the
    amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. “For jurisdiction to exist under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, there
    must be complete diversity between the parties, Which is to say that the plaintiff may not be a
    citizen of the same state as any defendant.” Bush v. Butler, 
    521 F. Supp. 2d 63
    , 71 (D.D.C.
    2007) (citing Owen Equz'p. & Erectz'on Co. v. Kroger, 
    437 U.S. 365
    , 373-74 (1978)). A party
    seeking relief in the district court must at least plead facts that bring the suit Within the court's
    jurisdiction See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).
    Plaintiff, a District of Columbia resident, has sued eight individuals who also reside in the
    District of Columbia. See Compl. Caption. Plaintiff complains about mold in her public housing
    unit and seeks $500,000 in money damages The complaint’s allegations do not present a federal
    question, and the case cannot proceed under the diversity Sta_tute because plaintiff and the
    defendants share the Same citizenship. Hence, this case Will be dismissed A Separate order
    @£L
    Date: June;l$ , 2017 United Sta);e/s District Judge
    accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2017-1210

Judges: Judge Tanya S. Chutkan

Filed Date: 6/26/2017

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 6/29/2017