in Re J Womack ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed
    October 27, 2015.
    In The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals
    NOS. 14-15-00881-CV and 14-15-00885-CV
    IN RE J WOMACK, Relator
    ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
    WRIT OF MANDAMUS
    Galveston County, Texas
    County Court Cause No. 06-FD-0536
    and Probate Court Cause No. SE-0001523
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On October 16, 2015, relator J Womack filed a petition for writ of
    mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); see also
    Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable
    John Grady, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 1, Galveston County,
    and the Honorable Kimberly Sullivan, presiding judge of the Probate Court,
    Galveston County to issue a temporary injunction to allow the adoption of a child
    and to allow an individual to inherit certain property.
    Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. “A party’s
    right to mandamus relief generally requires a predicate request for some action and
    a refusal of that request.” In re Perritt, 
    992 S.W.2d 444
    , 446 (Tex. 1999) (orig.
    proceeding). Relator has not shown that he requested the relief he seeks in his
    petition from the county court and the probate court and that these courts refused
    such relief, which are prerequisites for mandamus relief. See In re Clewis, 14-10-
    00086-CV, 
    2010 WL 547087
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 18,
    2010, orig. proceeding).
    Additionally, as the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing
    this Court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See
    Walker v. Packer, 
    827 S.W.2d 833
    , 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1)
    (relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is
    material to the relator’s claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying
    proceeding”). Relator has not provided this court with any record, much less a
    record that is sufficient to establish that he is entitled to the relief he seeks.
    Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.
    PER CURIAM
    Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally, and Wise.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-15-00885-CV

Filed Date: 10/27/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/29/2016