William Dale Redwine v. State ( 2009 )


Menu:
  • Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2009

    Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 9, 2009.

     

    In The

     

    Fourteenth Court of Appeals

    ____________

     

    NO. 14-08-00730-CR

    ____________

     

    WILLIAM DALE REDWINE, Appellant

     

    V.

     

    THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

     

      

     

    On Appeal from the 7th District Court

    Smith County, Texas

    Trial Court Cause No. 007-0848-08

     

      

     

    M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

    Appellant entered a guilty plea to bail jumping without an agreed recommendation on punishment.  On July 8, 2008, the trial court sentenced appellant to confinement for five years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal.


    Appellant=s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes this appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced.  See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811-12 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

    A copy of counsel=s brief was delivered to appellant.  Appellant was advised of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response.  See Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  As of this date, more than sixty days has elapsed and no pro se response has been filed.

    We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel=s brief and agree the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit.  Further, we find no reversible error in the record.  A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the state.  We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review.  See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827-28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

    Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

     

    PER CURIAM

     

    Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Yates and Frost.

    Do Not Publish C Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Document Info

Docket Number: 14-08-00730-CR

Filed Date: 7/9/2009

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/15/2015