People v. Hall CA4/2 ( 2014 )

Filed 11/4/14 P. v. Hall CA4/2
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified
for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for
publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E060698
v. (Super.Ct.No. FSB11745)
PARNEAL HALL, OPINION
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from the Superior Court of San Bernardino County. Victor R. Stull,
Judge. Affirmed.
John L. Dodd, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
Appellant.
No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
A jury convicted defendant and appellant Parneal Hall of second degree murder
(Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a), count 1)1 and two counts of attempted murder (§ 664/187,
1 All further statutory references will be to the Penal Code, unless otherwise
noted.
1
subd. (a), counts 2 & 3). The trial court sentenced him to 47 years eight months in state
prison, with 755 days of presentence custody credits. Defendant filed a motion to correct
his custody credits, which the court denied. His counsel subsequently submitted a letter
to the court stating that defendant was correct, and the court corrected defendant’s
credits.
On June 12, 2014, defendant filed a timely notice of appeal. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On May 14, 1998, defendant was sentenced to a total state prison term of 47 years
eight months, with 755 days of presentence custody credits (657 actual days plus 98
conduct days).
On January 1, 2014, defendant submitted a motion to correct his custody credits,
alleging that the court failed to give him one credit for the day of his arrest. The court
denied the motion. On February 19, 2014, defendant filed a notice of appeal.
After the notice of appeal was filed, this court appointed counsel to represent
defendant. On April 17, 2014, defendant’s appellate counsel filed a letter, explaining that
defendant was entitled to one additional day of credit. On May 6, 2014, the court granted
the request and directed the abstract of judgment to be amended to reflect 658 actual
days.
On June 12, 2014, defendant filed a notice of appeal, in propria persona, alleging
that he was entitled to be present during the entry of judgment on May 6, 2014.
2
ANALYSIS
Counsel has filed a brief under the authority of People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d
436 and Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, setting forth a statement of the case, a
brief statement of the facts, and identifying no potential arguable issues.
Defendant was offered an opportunity to file a personal supplemental brief, which
he has not done. Under People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have conducted an
independent review of the record and find no arguable issues.
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
HOLLENHORST
Acting P. J.
We concur:
KING
J.
MILLER
J.
3