People v. Rodriguez CA5 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Filed 11/3/14 P. v. Rodriguez CA5
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                                     F066775
    v.                                                    (Super. Ct. No. F12905505)
    ISAAC GUADALUPE RODRIGUEZ,                                                           OPINION
    Defendant and Appellant.
    THE COURT*
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. Arlan L.
    Harrell, Judge.
    Julia Freis, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    Office of the State Attorney General, Sacramento, California, for Plaintiff and
    Respondent.
    -ooOoo-
    *        Before Levy, Acting P.J., Franson, J., and Peña, J.
    Appellant, Isaac Guadalupe Rodriguez, pled guilty to inflicting corporal injury on
    a cohabitant (Pen. Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)) and he admitted allegations that he had two
    prior convictions within the meaning of the three strikes law.
    Following independent review of the record pursuant to People v. Wende (1979)
    
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    , we affirm.
    FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
    On May 27, 2012, Rodriguez was outside a residence when he accused A.R.,
    whom he had recently married, of having an affair. After Rodriguez apologized and A.R.
    let him into the house to talk, he again began accusing her of having an affair. Rodriguez
    then grabbed A.R. by the hair, threw her on the ground and began striking her with a
    closed fist. Rodriguez’s mother was at the house and pulled Rodriguez off A.R. who then
    ran to the kitchen with Rodriguez chasing her. After A.R. hit a table and fell down,
    Rodriguez began kicking her and striking her with a closed fist. Rodriguez’s mother
    again took Rodriguez off of A.R. and after things calmed down, A.R. agreed to go home
    with Rodriguez and there were no further disturbances that day.
    On May 29, 2012, after again accusing A.R. of having an affair, Rodriguez placed
    his hands around A.R.’s neck, and began strangling her. Although A.R. did not lose
    consciousness, Rodriguez left red marks on her neck and the pressure caused her voice to
    change.
    On June 2, 2012, while at their residence packing their belongings to move out,
    Rodriguez became upset, took the keys to A.R.’s truck, and attempted to drive off. A.R.,
    however, eventually got the keys back and drove off without Rodriguez. Later, she
    called the police to ask for help in retrieving her belongings from the residence and she
    reported the two earlier incidents to the officer who responded. The officer observed
    bruises throughout A.R.’s body and a small cut on her right cheek.
    On July 24, 2012, Rodriguez was arrested.
    2
    On July 26, 2012, the prosecutor filed a complaint charging Rodriguez with one
    count of spousal abuse and alleging two prior strikes.
    On August 29, 2012, Rodriguez entered his plea in this matter based on an
    indication by the court that it would strike one of his strike convictions.
    On January 10, 2013, the court sentenced Rodriguez to an eight-year prison term,
    the aggravated term of four years doubled to eight years because of Rodriguez’s
    remaining strike conviction.
    Rodriguez’s appellate counsel has filed a brief which summarizes the facts, with
    citations to the record, raises no issues, and asks this court to independently review the
    record. (People v. 
    Wende, supra
    , 
    25 Cal. 3d 436
    .) Rodriguez has not responded to this
    court’s invitation to submit additional briefing.
    Following an independent review of the record we find that no reasonably
    arguable factual or legal issues exist.
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: F066775

Filed Date: 11/3/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021