People v. Hermann CA3 ( 2014 )


Menu:
  • Filed 11/12/14 P. v. Hermann CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (Glenn)
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                  C075496
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                       (Super. Ct. Nos.
    11NCR08616, 13NCR09711,
    v.                                                                        & 13NCR09755)
    CHARLES LOUIS HERMANN, JR.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    This appeal comes to us pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    (Wende).
    In case No. 13NCR09711, a felony complaint filed in July 2013 charged defendant
    Charles Louis Hermann, Jr., with corporal injury to a spouse or cohabitant (count I Pen.
    Code, § 273.5, subd. (a)).1
    In case No. 13NCR09755, a complaint filed in September 2013 charged defendant
    with transportation of a controlled substance (count I Health & Saf. Code, § 11379, subd.
    (a)); transportation of a different controlled substance (count II; Health & Saf. Code,
    1        Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
    1
    § 11352, subd. (a)); intent to defraud with license plate (count III; Veh. Code, § 4463,
    subd. (a)(1)); and driving without a valid license (count IV; Veh. Code, § 12500, subd.
    (a)). As to the three felony counts (counts I, II, & III), it was alleged that defendant was
    on bail when he committed the offenses.
    In October 2013, defendant pled no contest to count I in case No. 13NCR09711
    and to counts I and III in case No. 13NCR09755, and admitted two violations of
    probation in case No. 11NCR08616 (misdemeanor domestic battery, § 243, subd. (e)(1)).
    In return, the People agreed not to file charges in another alleged domestic violence case.
    It was understood that the maximum sentence as to case No. 13NCR09711 was four
    years in state prison and the maximum sentence as to case No. 13NCR09755 was four
    years eight months, but a probation report which would combine all the cases for
    purposes of a sentencing report would be issued.
    According to the sheriff’s report in case No. 13NCR09711, on July 12, 2013,
    defendant and his live-in girlfriend had an argument. Defendant spit on her and yelled in
    her face, then pushed her backwards. After she fell to the floor, he got on top of her and
    punched her about the head and upper torso.
    According to the sheriff’s report in case No. 13NCR09755, an uniformed patrol
    officer in a marked K-9 patrol car saw a truck driven by defendant pull out onto Highway
    99, directly into the path of an oncoming vehicle which had to brake to avoid the truck.
    On making a traffic stop of defendant’s truck, the officer determined that defendant’s
    driver’s license had expired. The officer’s dog alerted to the odor of a drug while
    sniffing the truck’s exterior. The officer searched the interior and found a camouflage
    bag that held a methamphetamine smoking pipe; two baggies, one appearing to contain
    methamphetamine and the other marijuana; three used syringes; and an unlabeled pill
    bottle containing prescription-only medications. A further search detected seven
    California license plates behind the truck’s bench seat. Three of the plates were
    registered to defendant, but did not belong to the truck. Another plate, which was not
    2
    attached to the truck, belonged to the truck, but defendant was not the truck’s registered
    owner and the registration had not been paid since 2005. The other plates belonged to
    other persons and other vehicles.
    In November 2013, the trial court sentenced defendant to an aggregate term of
    four years eight months in state prison in case Nos. 13NCR09711 and 13NCR09755,
    consisting of the middle term of three years on count I in case No. 13NCR09711, plus
    one year (one-third the middle term) on count I and eight months (one-third the middle
    term) on count III in case No. 13NCR09755. The court also sentenced defendant to one
    year in county jail in case No. 11NCR08616, to run consecutively to his state prison term.
    The court awarded defendant 129 days of presentence custody credits (65 actual days &
    64 conduct days), ascribed entirely to case No. 13NCR09755. The court imposed an
    $820 restitution fine and a suspended parole revocation restitution fine in the same
    amount in case No. 13NCR09711, and a $560 restitution fine and a suspended parole
    revocation restitution fine in the same amount in case No. 13NCR09755.
    We appointed counsel to represent defendant on appeal. Counsel filed an opening
    brief that sets forth the facts of the case and requests this court to review the record and
    determine whether there are any arguable issues on appeal. (Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .) Defendant was advised by counsel of the right to file a supplemental brief within
    30 days of the date of filing of the opening brief. More than 30 days elapsed, and we
    received no communication from defendant. Having undertaken an examination of the
    entire record, we find no arguable error that would result in a disposition more favorable
    to defendant.
    We must remand the matter to the trial court, however, because the record does
    not show that the court entered any disposition as to as to counts II and IV and the on-bail
    allegations in case No. 13NCR09755.
    3
    DISPOSITION
    Defendant’s convictions are affirmed. The matter is remanded to the trial court
    with directions to enter a disposition as to counts II and IV and the on-bail allegations in
    case No. 13NCR09755, to prepare an amended abstract of judgment that sets out that
    disposition, and to forward a certified copy of the amended abstract of judgment to the
    Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
    BLEASE                     , Acting P. J.
    We concur:
    HULL                       , J.
    MURRAY                     , J.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C075496

Filed Date: 11/12/2014

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/17/2021