-
SHINN, P. J. I dissent.
The Washington judgment should be read as if it contained in terms the statutory limitation; thus upon the expiration of six years it ceased to be a judgment for any purpose. The present action was not upon the debt; it was upon the judgment. The California judgment could not add to or detract from that judgment in any material respect. It could not delete the limitation of the Washington judgment and in so doing render an entirely different judgment. It should have incorporated a limitation in accordance with the Washington statute.
Document Info
Docket Number: Civ. 27102
Citation Numbers: 229 Cal. App. 2d 290
Judges: Files, Shinn
Filed Date: 8/19/1964
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 8/26/2023