People v. Peternell CA3 ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/24/20 P. v. Peternell CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (El Dorado)
    ----
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                   C091018
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   (Super. Ct. No. S15CRF0203)
    v.
    MICHAEL JOSEPH PETERNELL,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Appointed counsel for defendant Michael Joseph Peternell has asked this court to
    conduct an independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable
    issues on appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .) Finding no arguable error in
    defendant’s favor, we affirm.
    BACKGROUND
    Defendant appeals from his sentencing following the revocation of his probation
    after a contested hearing.
    1
    On January 4, 2016, defendant pleaded no contest to a single count of domestic
    violence and admitted to being previously convicted of a domestic violence offense. In
    exchange for his plea, the trial court granted defendant 60 months of formal probation.
    On September 17, 2018, the probation department filed a petition to revoke
    defendant’s probation. The trial court reinstated defendant’s probation on March 18,
    2019, but at that time imposed and stayed an upper-term sentence of five years in prison.
    A few months later, the probation department filed another petition to revoke defendant’s
    probation. On August 9, 2019, the court held a contested violation hearing and sustained
    two of the four violations alleged in the petition. At defendant’s sentencing, held on
    October 7, 2019, the court lifted the stay on the previously imposed prison sentence.
    Defendant timely appealed.
    DISCUSSION
    Appointed counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural
    history of the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether
    there are any arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    .)
    Defendant was advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days
    from the date the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and
    defendant has not filed a supplemental brief. Our review of the record pursuant to Wende
    has disclosed no arguable errors in defendant’s favor.
    2
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    /s/
    Duarte, J.
    We concur:
    /s/
    Mauro, Acting P. J.
    /s/
    Hoch, J.
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C091018

Filed Date: 12/24/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/24/2020