People v. Johnson CA2/1 ( 2020 )


Menu:
  • Filed 12/29/20 P. v. Johnson CA2/1
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on
    opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule
    8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for
    purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION ONE
    THE PEOPLE,                                                    B299923
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                              (Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. BA471346)
    v.
    JAMAINE JOHNSON,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los
    Angeles County, Mildred Escobedo, Judge. Affirmed.
    Jamaine Johnson, in pro. per.; and Miriam K. Billington,
    under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and
    Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    ___________________________________
    On the evening of September 4, 2018, Johnson and Crystal
    M., his girlfriend and the mother of his child, drank several
    alcoholic beverages and visited a nightclub. After dancing for a
    few minutes, Johnson excused himself to visit the restroom,
    where he ingested unknown drugs. When he returned, “he was a
    different person”; he was sweating and slurring his words, and
    his pupils were dilated. Johnson and Crystal M. left the club and
    engaged in a heated argument in their car, during which Johnson
    beat and choked Crystal, and eventually produced a six-inch
    kitchen knife with which he stabbed and cut her several times,
    causing severe injuries.
    Johnson was convicted of attempted murder, domestic
    violence, making criminal threats, and mayhem, and was
    sentenced to 29 years in prison.
    He appeals.
    We appointed counsel to represent Johnson on appeal.
    After examination of the record, appointed counsel filed an
    opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to review
    the record independently. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    ,
    441-442.) On October 9, 2020, we sent letters to Johnson and
    appointed counsel, directing counsel to forward the appellate
    record to Johnson and advising him that within 30 days he could
    personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to
    consider.
    Johnson filed a letter brief, in which he contends the
    evidence of his drug use and altered personality before
    commission of the offenses against Crystal M. obligated the trial
    court to determine his competency to stand trial pursuant to
    Penal Code section 1368.1, and to order pretrial diversion for
    mental health treatment pursuant to Penal Code section 1001.36.
    2
    Johnson argues that because no determination of his competence
    to stand trial was made, his conviction violated due process.
    We disagree. Penal Code section 1001.36 permits a court to
    postpone trial when the “defendant suffers from a mental
    disorder as identified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic
    and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, including, but not
    limited to, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective
    disorder, or post-traumatic stress disorder, but excluding
    antisocial personality disorder, borderline personality disorder,
    and pedophilia.” (Pen. Code, § 1001.36, subd. (b)(1)(A).) But
    nothing in the record suggests Johnson suffers from any of these
    disorders.
    Although the latest edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical
    Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) recognizes substance use
    disorders (see In re Christopher R. (2014) 
    225 Cal.App.4th 1210
    ,
    1219), nothing in the record suggests that Johnson has been
    diagnosed with a substance use disorder or could produce such a
    diagnosis from a qualifying mental health expert.
    We have otherwise examined the entire record and find no
    arguable issue exists, and are therefore satisfied Johnson’s
    attorney complied with her responsibilities. (People v. Wende,
    supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
    3
    DISPOSITION
    The order is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    CHANEY, J.
    We concur:
    ROTHSCHILD, P. J.
    FEDERMAN, J.*
    *Judge of the San Luis Obispo County Superior Court,
    assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of
    the California Constitution.
    4
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B299923

Filed Date: 12/29/2020

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 12/29/2020