In re B.D. CA2/6 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Filed 4/5/21 In re B.D. CA2/6
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
    not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
    has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SIX
    In re B.D., a Person Coming                                    2d Juv. No. B306538
    Under the Juvenile Court Law.                                (Super. Ct. No. PJ51987)
    (Los Angeles County)
    THE PEOPLE,
    Plaintiff and Respondent,
    v.
    B.D.,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    In 2016, B.D., a juvenile, admitted to assault with force
    likely to produce great bodily injury. (Pen. Code, § 245, subd.
    (a)(4).)1 He was placed on probation. His maximum term of
    confinement was four years.
    In 2018, B.D. admitted to assault with force likely to
    produce great bodily injury. (§ 245, subd. (a)(4).) He was
    1   All statutory references are to the Penal Code.
    committed to a long-term camp. His maximum term of
    confinement was five years.
    In 2020, B.D. admitted to a probation violation, failure to
    obey all laws and instructions of a probation officer. He was
    committed to the Division of Juvenile Justice (DJJ). His
    maximum term of confinement was five years. The DJJ rejected
    him from that program and he was ordered to serve 45 days in
    county jail.
    B.D. filed a timely notice of appeal.
    We appointed counsel to represent B.D. in this appeal.
    After examining the record, he filed a brief raising no issues.
    On January 5, 2021, we advised B.D. by mail that he had
    30 days within which to personally submit any contentions or
    issues that he wished to raise on appeal. We received no reply.
    We have reviewed the entire record and are satisfied that
    B.D.’s attorney has fully complied with his responsibilities and
    that no arguable issue exists. (People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    , 441.)
    The judgment is affirmed.
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
    GILBERT, P. J.
    We concur:
    PERREN, J.
    TANGEMAN, J.
    Fred J. Fujioka, Judge
    Superior Court County of Los Angeles
    ______________________________
    Steven A. Torres, under appointment by the Court of
    Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B306538

Filed Date: 4/5/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/5/2021