People v. Jones CA2/7 ( 2021 )


Menu:
  • Filed 4/16/21 P. v. Jones CA2/7
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions
    not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion
    has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
    DIVISION SEVEN
    THE PEOPLE,                                                    B301935
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                             (Los Angeles County
    Super. Ct. No. NA111425)
    v.
    DWAYNE MAURICE JONES,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of
    Los Angeles County, Laura L. Laesecke, Judge. Affirmed.
    Michele A. Douglass, under appointment by the Court of
    Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant.
    No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent.
    ___________
    Dwayne Maurice Jones was convicted following a jury trial
    of two counts of aggravated assault and several other felony and
    misdemeanor charges and sentenced to an aggregate state prison
    term of eight years four months. No arguable issues have been
    identified following review of the record by Jones’s appointed
    appellate counsel or our own independent review. We affirm.
    FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
    After being found mentally competent to stand trial, Jones
    was charged by information with assault by means of force likely
    to cause great bodily injury and personally inflicting great bodily
    injury (Pen. Code, §§ 245, subd. (a)(4), 12022.7, subd. (a);1
    count 1), two counts of vandalism causing damage of more than
    $400 (§ 594; counts 2 and 3), misdemeanor false imprisonment
    (§ 236; count 4), assault with a deadly weapon (a chair) (§ 245,
    subd. (a)(1); count 5), and misdemeanor battery (§ 242; count 6).
    All of the charged offenses took place at a housing complex for
    veterans in Long Beach.
    Count 1: According to the evidence at trial, as Charles Hill
    came in the gate at the housing complex on the evening of
    November 22, 2018, he was hit on the back of his head and
    pushed to the ground, which caused him to break his ankle. Hill
    turned his head and saw Jones. Hill’s injury required surgery.
    Testifying in his own defense, Jones denied he had hit, kicked or
    pushed Hill.
    Counts 3 and 4: In the evening of December 9, 2018
    Ronisha Belgrove was returning to her home at the housing
    complex when Jones began to follow her and then blocked her
    path. Belgrove returned to the car of the friend who had brought
    1     Statutory references are to this code.
    2
    her home; Jones followed her. Belgrove got inside the car and
    phoned the police. As the friend started to drive them away,
    Jones kicked the car, causing a dent. The driver’s insurance paid
    for the repair except for a $500 deductible. Jones denied this
    incident had taken place.
    Count 5: On December 21, 2018 Jones tried to attend a
    dinner that was limited to veterans who were participating in
    certain programs. He was refused entrance by Oliver Haddad,
    who was sitting at a table in the cafeteria, checking in guests.
    Jones left but returned moments later. When Haddad again
    refused to let Jones in, Jones slammed his hands on the table,
    said “Fuck you,” and flipped the table onto Haddad’s chest. After
    both men went outside, Jones picked up a lawn chair and threw
    it toward Haddad. It was stipulated that Haddad told police
    officers Jones had thrown the chair toward the building and it
    landed 10 feet away from him. Jones testified it was his
    understanding he was eligible for dinner because he had a meal
    ticket. He was angry when Haddad refused to admit him, and
    the two men argued. Jones denied flipping the table and
    explained he had thrown the chair out of his way when he was
    leaving; he did not throw it at Haddad.
    Count 6: On February 21, 2019 Jontez Bridges, a
    maintenance employee at the complex, greeted Jones. Jones
    asked her for a hug. She refused. Jones tried to hug her and
    grabbed for her jacket when she pulled away from him. Jones
    testified he and Bridges were friendly and he had asked for a hug
    without malice or sexual intent. He had no indication she was
    uncomfortable during their exchange.
    Count 2: On March 6, 2019 Jones was told he was being
    evicted because of behavior issues. Confronted by two sheriff’s
    3
    deputies and several housing complex employees, Jones ran to
    the social hall and used a chair to smash eight television
    monitors. The vandalism was recorded by the complex’s security
    cameras. When installed several years earlier, each television
    cost $3,395. Jones acknowledged he became upset when he was
    told he was being evicted and threw chairs at the televisions in
    the social hall.
    The jury found Jones not guilty of assault with a deadly
    weapon (count 5) and guilty on all other charges. It found true
    the allegation he had inflicted great bodily injury on Hill.
    At sentencing the court imposed an aggregate state prison
    term of eight years four months: the upper term of four years for
    assault by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury, plus
    three years for the great bodily injury enhancement, and
    consecutive terms of eight months (one-third the middle term) for
    each of the two vandalism counts. The court imposed concurrent
    terms of one year for false imprisonment and six months for
    battery. Jones was awarded 217 days of custody credit.
    Jones filed a notice of appeal on October 22, 2019.
    DISCUSSION
    We appointed counsel to represent Jones on appeal. After
    reviewing the record, counsel filed a brief raising no issues. On
    February 2, 2021 counsel wrote Jones and advised him he had
    30 days within which to submit any contentions or issues he
    wished the court to consider. We sent a similar notice to Jones on
    February 5, 2021. We have received no response.
    We have examined the record and are satisfied appellate
    counsel for Jones has complied with counsel’s responsibilities and
    there are no arguable issues. (Smith v. Robbins (2000) 
    528 U.S.
                                   4
    259, 277-284; People v. Kelly (2006) 
    40 Cal.4th 106
    , 118-119;
    People v. Wende (1979) 
    25 Cal.3d 436
    , 441-442.)
    DISPOSITION
    The judgment is affirmed.
    PERLUSS, P. J.
    We concur:
    SEGAL, J.
    FEUER, J.
    5
    

Document Info

Docket Number: B301935

Filed Date: 4/16/2021

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 4/16/2021