People v. Todd CA3 ( 2023 )


Menu:
  • Filed 5/17/23 P. v. Todd CA3
    NOT TO BE PUBLISHED
    California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
    publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication
    or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
    THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT
    (Yolo)
    ----
    THE PEOPLE,                                                                                C096871
    Plaintiff and Respondent,                                   (Super. Ct. No. CR1995-2576)
    v.
    MICHAEL ANDRE TODD,
    Defendant and Appellant.
    Defendant Michael Andre Todd appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for
    resentencing under Penal Code section 1172.6.1 Counsel filed a brief raising no arguable
    issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 
    14 Cal.5th 216
     and requesting we exercise our
    discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.
    1       Effective June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 to
    section 1172.6. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.) There were no substantive changes to the
    statute. Defendant filed his petition under former section 1170.95, but we cite to the
    current section 1172.6 in this opinion.
    1
    On February 27, 2023, we notified defendant: (1) counsel had filed a brief
    indicating no arguable issues had been identified by counsel; (2) as a case arising from an
    order denying postconviction relief, defendant was not entitled to counsel or to an
    independent review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set forth in
    People v. Delgadillo, supra, 
    14 Cal.5th 216
    , defendant had 30 days in which to file a
    supplemental brief or letter raising any argument he wanted this court to consider. In
    addition, we notified defendant if we did not receive a letter or brief within that 30-day
    period, the court may dismiss the appeal as abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed
    and we have received no communication from defendant.
    We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.
    (People v. Delgadillo, supra, 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)
    DISPOSITION
    The appeal is dismissed.
    /s/
    ROBIE, Acting P. J.
    We concur:
    /s/
    KRAUSE, J.
    /s/
    EARL, J.
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: C096871

Filed Date: 5/17/2023

Precedential Status: Non-Precedential

Modified Date: 5/17/2023