-
The horse was exempt from attachment, if required for farming or teaming purposes, or other actual use. G. L., c. 224, s. 2). This was a question of fact, which has been determined at the trial term in favor of the plaintiff. Somers v. Emerson,
58 N.H. 48 ; Parshley v. Green,58 N.H. 271 ; Rice v. Wadsworth,59 N.H. 100 ; Richards v. Hubbard,59 N.H. 158 ; George v. Fellows,59 N.H. 206 ; Cutting v. Tappan,59 N.H. 562 ; Hall v. Nelson,59 N.H. 573 ; George v. Fellows,60 N.H. 398 ; Jaquith v. Scott,63 N.H. 5 . The evidence was sufficient to justify the finding.Exception overruled.
ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.
Document Info
Citation Numbers: 13 A. 648, 64 N.H. 460
Judges: SMITH, J.
Filed Date: 12/5/1887
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 1/12/2023