FAG Italia v. United States , 2005 CIT 140 ( 2005 )


Menu:
  •                          Slip Op. 05-140
    UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE
    BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    ________________________________________
    :
    FAG ITALIA, S.p.A., FAG BEARINGS CORP., :
    SKF USA Inc. and SKF INDUSTRIE S.p.A., :
    :
    Plaintiffs and           :
    Defendant-Intervenors,   :
    :
    v.                            :
    :
    UNITED STATES,                          :     Consol. Court No.
    :        97-00260-S
    Defendant,               :
    :
    and                      :
    :
    THE TORRINGTON COMPANY,                 :
    :
    Defendant-Intervenor     :
    and Plaintiff.           :
    ________________________________________:
    Judgment
    This matter comes before the Court pursuant to the decision of
    the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“CAFC”) in FAG Italia
    v. United States, 
    402 F.3d 1356
     (Fed. Cir. 2005) and the CAFC’s
    mandate of May 31, 2005, reversing and remanding the judgment of
    the Court in FAG Italia v. United States, 
    24 CIT 1311
     (2000) and
    FAG Italia v. United States, 
    25 CIT 1038
     (2001) (affirming remand
    results submitted pursuant to FAG Italia, 
    24 CIT 1311
    ).1 Based on
    the CAFC’s decision, the Court remanded this matter to the United
    States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”).          Commerce was
    instructed to allow FAG Italia, S.p.A. (“FAG Italia”) an
    opportunity to demonstrate that its antidumping duty margin was
    incorrectly determined because Commerce’s use of actual expenses
    did not account for United States credit and inventory carrying
    costs in the calculation of total expenses. See Order (July 6,
    2005).    Commerce filed its Final Results of Redetermination
    Pursuant to Court Remands (“Remand Results”) on October 5, 2005.
    Pursuant to the Court’s remand, Commerce invited FAG Italia to show
    1
    The Torrington Company was acquired by the Timken Company
    in 2003, and is now known as Timken U.S. Corporation.
    Consol. Court No. 97-00260-S                               Page 2
    that its dumping margin had been incorrectly determined.   See
    Remand Results at 3. FAG Italia, however, failed to respond to
    Commerce’s invitation. See id. at 3-4.
    Commerce determined that it had properly calculated FAG
    Italia’s antidumping duty margin and did not change the previously
    assigned margin. See id. at 4-5. FAG Italia’s weighted-average
    percentage margin for the period of May 1, 1994, through April 30,
    1995, is 4.12 percent for ball bearings and parts thereof.
    This Court, having received and reviewed Commerce’s Remand
    Results, holds that Commerce duly complied with the Court’s remand
    order and it is hereby
    ORDERED that Commerce’s Remand Results are reasonable,
    supported by substantial evidence, and is otherwise in accordance
    with law; and it is further
    ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on October
    5, 2005, are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further
    ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this
    case is dismissed.
    /s/ Nicholas Tsoucalas
    NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS
    SENIOR JUDGE
    Dated:    October 28, 2005
    New York, New York
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Consol. 97-00260-S

Citation Numbers: 2005 CIT 140

Filed Date: 10/28/2005

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/25/2018