Avalos, Ex Parte Ismael ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-76,341
    EX PARTE ISMAEL AVALOS, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. 1059142 IN THE 337 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HARRIS COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession with
    intent to deliver a controlled substance, and was sentenced to thirty-three years’ imprisonment. The
    Fourteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Avalos v. State, No. 14-06-00969-CR (Tex.
    App. – Houston [14th Dist.], May 15, 2008).
    Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel
    failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of
    2
    his right to petition for discretionary review pro se.
    Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court
    has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that appellate counsel failed to timely notify
    Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition for
    discretionary review pro se. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 
    956 S.W.2d 25
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity
    to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review of the judgment of the Fourteenth Court of
    Appeals in Cause No. 14-06-00969-CR that affirmed his conviction in Case No. 1059142 from the
    337th Judicial District Court of Harris County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary
    review with the Fourteenth Court of Appeals within 30 days of the date on which this Court’s
    mandate issues. Applicant's remaining claim is dismissed. See Ex parte Torres, 
    943 S.W.2d 469
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).
    Delivered: May 5, 2010
    Do not publish
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,341

Filed Date: 5/5/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015