-
15-2773 Salto-Seico v. Sessions BIA Straus, IJ A200 897 646 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT. CITATION TO A SUMMARY ORDER FILED ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2007, IS PERMITTED AND IS GOVERNED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 32.1 AND THIS COURT=S LOCAL RULE 32.1.1. WHEN CITING A SUMMARY ORDER IN A DOCUMENT FILED WITH THIS COURT, A PARTY MUST CITE EITHER THE FEDERAL APPENDIX OR AN ELECTRONIC DATABASE (WITH THE NOTATION “SUMMARY ORDER”). A PARTY CITING TO A SUMMARY ORDER MUST SERVE A COPY OF IT ON ANY PARTY NOT REPRESENTED BY COUNSEL. 1 At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for 2 the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States 3 Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 4 26th day of June, two thousand seventeen. 5 6 PRESENT: 7 PIERRE N. LEVAL, 8 ROBERT D. SACK, 9 CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, 10 Circuit Judges. 11 _____________________________________ 12 13 OLGER ABEL SALTO-SEICO, 14 Petitioner, 15 16 v. 15-2773 17 NAC 18 JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, UNITED 19 STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, 20 Respondent. 21 _____________________________________ 22 23 FOR PETITIONER: Gregory Osakwe, Hartford, CT. 24 25 FOR RESPONDENT: Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy 26 Assistant Attorney General; Shelley 27 R. Goad, Assistant Director; Nancy 28 K. Canter, Trial Attorney, Office of 29 Immigration Litigation, United 30 States Department of Justice, 31 Washington, DC. 1 UPON DUE CONSIDERATION of this petition for review of a 2 Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision, it is hereby 3 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is 4 DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. 5 Petitioner Olger Abel Salto-Seico, a native and citizen of 6 Ecuador, seeks review of a March 4, 2015, decision of the BIA 7 affirming a February 5, 2013, decision of the Immigration Judge 8 denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 9 relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and an 10 August 25, 2015, decision of the BIA denying his motion to 11 reopen. In re Olger Abel Salto-Seico, No. A200 897 646 (B.I.A.
12 A.K. Marsh. 4, 2015), aff’g No. A200 897 646 (Immig. Ct. Hartford Feb. 13 5, 2013); In re Olger Abel Salto-Seico, No. A200 897 646 (B.I.A. 14 Aug. 25, 2015). We assume the parties’ familiarity with the 15 underlying facts and procedural history in this case. 16 We dismiss the petition for review as to the BIA’s March 17 2015 decision ordering Salto-Seico removed to Ecuador and 18 denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and 19 CAT relief. We lack jurisdiction to review that decision 20 because the September 2015 petition for review is untimely to 21 challenge a March 2015 decision. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) (“A 22 petition for review must be filed not later than 30 days after 23 the date of the final order of removal.”); Luna v. Holder, 637 2
1 F.3d 85, 92 (2d Cir. 2011). “[T]he filing of a motion to reopen 2 does not toll the time for filing a petition for review of the 3 BIA's final exclusion or deportation orders[.]” Kaur v. BIA, 4
413 F.3d 232, 233 (2d Cir. 2005). 5 Salto-Seico’s brief raises no arguments with respect to the 6 BIA’s denial of reopening. “Issues not sufficiently argued in 7 the briefs are considered waived and normally will not be 8 addressed on appeal.” Norton v. Sam’s Club,
145 F.3d 114, 117 9 (2d Cir. 1998). Accordingly, he has waived review of that 10 determination and we deny the petition as to the August 2015 11 decision. Id.; see also Yueqing Zhang v. Gonzales,
426 F.3d 12540, 545 n.7 (2d Cir. 2005). 13 For the foregoing reasons, the petition for review is 14 DISMISSED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. As we have completed our 15 review, any stay of removal that the Court previously granted 16 in this petition is VACATED, and any pending motion for a stay 17 of removal in this petition is DISMISSED as moot. Any pending 18 request for oral argument in this petition is DENIED in 19 accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 34(a)(2), 20 and Second Circuit Local Rule 34.1(b). 21 FOR THE COURT: 22 Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 3
Document Info
Docket Number: 15-2773
Citation Numbers: 692 F. App'x 661
Filed Date: 6/26/2017
Precedential Status: Non-Precedential
Modified Date: 1/13/2023