Rickey Paul Robinson v. State ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •        TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
    NO. 03-10-00369-CR
    Rickey Paul Robinson, Appellant
    v.
    The State of Texas, Appellee
    FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY, 207TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    NO. CR2005-355, HONORABLE GARY L. STEEL, JUDGE PRESIDING
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    On July 18, 2006, appellant Rickey Paul Robinson was placed on deferred
    adjudication community supervision after he pleaded guilty to burglary of a building. See Tex. Penal
    Code Ann. § 30.02 (West 2003). The original term of supervision was 540 days, but the term was
    twice extended by the trial court. On May 27, 2010, following a hearing on the State’s motion
    to adjudicate, the court adjudged appellant guilty and assessed punishment at twenty months in
    state jail.
    Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a
    brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of
    Anders v. California, 
    386 U.S. 738
    , 744 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record
    demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio,
    
    488 U.S. 75
    (1988); High v. State, 
    573 S.W.2d 807
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State,
    
    516 S.W.2d 684
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 
    485 S.W.2d 553
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1972);
    Gainous v. State, 
    436 S.W.2d 137
    (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant received a copy of counsel’s
    brief and was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See
    
    Anders, 386 U.S. at 744
    . No pro se brief has been filed.
    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Garner v. State, 
    300 S.W.3d 763
    , 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); Bledsoe v. State, 
    178 S.W.3d 824
    , 826-27 (Tex. Crim.
    App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to withdraw
    is granted.
    The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
    ____________________________________________
    J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice
    Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin
    Affirmed
    Filed: March 24, 2011
    Do Not Publish
    2