Noyes v. University Realty, Inc. , 1 Conn. App. 453 ( 1984 )


Menu:
  • The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant's absence warranted reargument.

    Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

    There is no error.

Document Info

Docket Number: (2282)

Citation Numbers: 472 A.2d 808, 1 Conn. App. 453

Judges: PER CURIAM.

Filed Date: 2/8/1984

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023