Rodriguez, Ex Parte Juan Carlos ( 2011 )


Menu:
  •              IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS
    OF TEXAS
    NO. AP-76,477
    EX PARTE JUAN CARLOS RODRIGUEZ, Applicant
    ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
    CAUSE NO. CR-0291-91-D IN THE 206th DISTRICT COURT
    FROM HIDALGO COUNTY
    Per curiam.
    OPINION
    Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the
    clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte
    Young, 
    418 S.W.2d 824
    , 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of
    aggravated sexual assault and two counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to fourteen
    years’ imprisonment on the first count and ten years community supervision on the other two counts.
    The Applicant’s appeals were dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Rodriguez v. State, Nos. 13-91-
    2
    00628, 00629, and 00632-CR (Tex. App.–Corpus Christi, delivered January 3, 1992, no pet.).1
    Applicant contends that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he failed to
    timely file a notice of appeal.
    The record before this Court reflects that trial counsel, after giving verbal notice of
    withdrawal to both the Applicant and the trial court, did not file a pro se notice of appeal on
    Applicant’s behalf in order to preserve his right to a meaningful appeal. We find, therefore, that
    Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction
    as it relates to Count One in Cause No. CR-0291-91-D from the 206th Judicial District Court of
    Hidalgo County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice
    of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits
    shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this
    Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative
    steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court
    issues.
    Applicant’s claims regarding the remaining counts are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
    Delivered: January 12, 2011
    Do Not Publish
    1
    This application was filed with the district clerk of Hidalgo County on March 24, 1994.
    However, it was not received by this Court until December 10, 2010. There is no explanation in
    the habeas record for this sixteen year delay.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: AP-76,477

Filed Date: 1/12/2011

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 9/16/2015