Khalil Pakideh and Alma Investments Inc., D/B/A Texas Alma Investments v. William L. Pope and Adams & Graham, L. L. P. ( 2012 )

NUMBER 13-11-00792-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ KHALIL PAKIDEH AND ALMA INVESTMENTS INC., D/B/A TEXAS ALMA INVESTMENTS, Appellants, v. WILLIAM L. POPE AND ADAMS & GRAHAM, L.L.P., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellants’ brief in the above cause was due on July 9, 2012. On July 20, 2012, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants’ failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received from appellants. Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file the brief, or file the brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 30th day of August, 2012. 2