Richard Andrew Wetmore v. State ( 2011 )

IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00422-CR
RICHARD ANDREW WETMORE,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee
From the 13th District Court
Navarro County, Texas
Trial Court No. 33239-CR
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Richard Wetmore attempts to appeal the trial court’s denial of his motion to
suppress. By letter dated November 8, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Wetmore
that the appeal was subject to dismissal because it appeared that this Court does not
have jurisdiction over the trial court’s interlocutory order. See McKown v. State, 915
S.W.2d 160 (Tex. App.─Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). The Clerk also warned Wetmore that
the appeal would be dismissed unless, within 21 days of the date of the letter, a
response was filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3.
Wetmore has not filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal.
We do not have jurisdiction to consider Wetmore’s interlocutory appeal.
McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d at 161. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.
AL SCOGGINS
Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray,
Justice Davis, and
Justice Scoggins
Appeal dismissed
Opinion delivered and filed December 21, 2011
Do not publish
[CR25]
Wetmore v. State Page 2