Carlos Javier Chavez v. State ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •                             Fourth Court of Appeals
    San Antonio, Texas
    October 17, 2018
    No. 04-18-00357-CR & 04-18-00358-CR
    Carlos Javier CHAVEZ,
    Appellant
    v.
    The STATE of Texas,
    Appellee
    From the County Court at Law No. 6, Bexar County, Texas
    Trial Court No. 551667 & 551669
    Honorable Wayne A. Christian, Judge Presiding
    ORDER
    On October 8, 2018, appellant’s appointed counsel, Suzanne Kramer, filed a purported
    Anders brief. However, when she filed the brief, Ms. Kramer filed neither a motion to withdraw
    nor proof pursuant to Kelly v. State that she had provided appellant with a form motion to allow
    him to request the record from this court. See Kelly v. State, 
    436 S.W.3d 313
    (Tex. Crim. App.
    2014). Ms. Kramer subsequently filed her motion to withdraw, but did not file proof that she had
    provided appellant with a form motion as mandated by Kelly.
    After telephone calls from our clerk’s office, Ms. Kramer, on October 10, 2018, filed a
    document entitled “Motion for a Free Reporter’s Record on Appeal.” In that motion, she asks
    that this court “grant this Motion … should [appellant] decided [sic] to proceed pro se.”
    Appellant is indigent and he is entitled to a free record should he request one. Thus, we DENY
    AS MOOT the motion for a free record. This motion for a free reporter’s record filed by Ms.
    Kramer is not the motion mandated by the court’s decision in Kelly v. State. In Kelly, the court
    of criminal appeals specifically stated that in Anders cases, in addition to appointed counsel’s
    other duties, counsel must provide appellant with a form motion for purposes of requesting the
    record and inform appellant that “in order to effectuate his right to review the appellate record
    pro se, should he choose to invoke it, he must sign and date the motion and send it on to the court
    of appeals within ten days of the date of the letter from appellate counsel.” 
    Id. at 319–20.
    Counsel must must “notify the court of appeals, in writing” that she has informed the appellant
    of the motion to withdraw and the Anders brief, provided the appellant with copies of the
    documents, notified him of his pro se rights, and that she has supplied the appellant with a form
    motion for pro se access to the appellate record and the court’s mailing address.
    Although Ms. Kramer filed her Anders brief, a motion to withdraw, and a letter
    establishing that she provided appellant with copies of same and advised appellant of his right to
    review the record and file a pro se brief, she has failed to provide proof to this court that she has
    supplied appellant with a form motion to allow appellant pro se access to the appellate record,
    advised him of this court’s mailing address, and advised that he should file said motion, should
    he desire to file his own brief, within ten days of receiving it. Thus, Ms. Kramer has failed to
    comply with her duties pursuant to Anders as set out by the court of criminal appeals in Kelly.
    See 
    id. Accordingly, we
    ORDER Suzanne Kramer, to file in this court on or before 12:00 p.m.
    on Friday, October 19, 2018, proof that: (1) she has supplied appellant with a form motion
    for pro se access to the appellate record; (2) advised appellant of this court’s mailing
    address; and (3) advised appellant that should he desire access to the record for purposes
    of filing a pro se brief, he must sign, date, and send the motion for access to the record to
    this court within ten days of the date of her letter. If Ms. Kramer fails to timely comply
    with this court’s order by the date ordered, she may be ordered to appear and show cause
    why she should not be held in civil or criminal contempt of this court or otherwise
    sanctioned.
    We order the clerk of this court to serve this order on Suzanne Kramer by first class
    United States mail and by certified mail, return receipt requested, with delivery restricted to
    addressee only, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of delivery. We further
    order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on Suzanne Kramer by facsimile and by
    email, and to call and advise her of this court’s order and its deadline. The order shall also be
    served on counsel for the State.
    _________________________________
    Marialyn Barnard, Justice
    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
    court on this 17th day of October, 2018.
    ___________________________________
    KEITH E. HOTTLE,
    Clerk of Court
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 04-18-00357-CR

Filed Date: 10/17/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/18/2018