In re Robin T. Browder , 115 A.3d 601 ( 2015 )


Menu:
  • Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the
    Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the
    Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound
    volumes go to press.
    DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS
    No. 15-BS-262
    IN RE ROBIN T. BROWDER, RESPONDENT.
    A Member of the Bar
    of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
    (Bar Registration No. 482885)
    On Report and Recommendation of Hearing Committee Number Seven
    Approving Petition for Negotiated Discipline
    (BDN D73-07)
    (Decided: June 4, 2015)
    Before FISHER and THOMPSON, Associate Judges, and STEADMAN, Senior
    Judge.
    PER CURIAM: This decision is issued as non-precedential. Please refer to
    D.C. Bar R. XI, § 12.1 (d) governing the appropriate citation of this opinion.
    In   this   disciplinary     matter,   Hearing   Committee   Number        Seven
    (“Committee”) recommends approval of an amended petition for negotiated
    attorney discipline.    The violations stem from respondent Robin T. Browder’s
    neglect in eight separate personal injury cases and misrepresentations made to
    conceal her neglect that occurred during the years 2005-2007.
    2
    Based upon the neglect of these eight clients, respondent admittedly violated
    six rules of the District of Columbia Rules of Professional Conduct over an
    eighteen-month period.    As a result, Bar Counsel and respondent negotiated
    imposition of discipline in the form of a ninety-day suspension, stayed in favor of
    one-year unsupervised probation with conditions including that respondent not be
    the subject of another disciplinary action and complete a continuing legal
    education course approved by Bar Counsel. If respondent fails to comply with
    these and other conditions of her probation, her probation will be revoked, the
    ninety-day suspension imposed, and respondent must demonstrate fitness prior to
    reinstatement.   Bar Counsel filed an amended petition to this effect and the
    Committee concluded, after the limited hearing on the petition and an in camera
    review of Bar Counsel’s investigative files and records, that respondent violated
    the numerous Rules of Professional Conduct identified in the amended petition.
    We agree with the Committee’s recommendation because it properly applied
    D.C. Bar R. XI, 12.1 (c) to arrive at this conclusion, and we find no error in the
    Committee’s determination.       Furthermore, the Committee considered the
    aggravating factors and mitigating circumstances, including respondent’s multiple
    mental and physical stressors that led to major depression and caused her
    3
    misconduct, respondent taking full responsibility for her actions, the lack of any
    prior disciplinary complaints, the short period of time she had been licensed, and
    her full cooperation with Bar Counsel. The Committee also considered that, since
    the time period in question, respondent has achieved success in a different practice
    setting, and has had no difficulties with her job and no further disciplinary
    complaints. Based upon the record before the court, the negotiated discipline of a
    ninety-day suspension from the practice of law suspended in favor of one-year
    unsupervised probation1 is not unduly lenient and is supported by discipline
    imposed by this court for similar actions with aggravating circumstances.2
    Furthermore, in light of the mitigating factors, we adopt the recommendation that a
    fitness requirement be imposed if respondent’s probation is revoked.
    1
    Respondent is not required to file a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit
    because respondent’s suspension is stayed.
    2
    See In re Chapman, 
    962 A.2d 922
    (D.C. 2009) (summarizing the range of
    sanctions previously imposed by this court for attorney neglect cases with
    aggravating circumstances).
    4
    In accordance with our procedures in uncontested disciplinary cases, we
    agree this case is appropriate for negotiated discipline, and we accept the
    Committee’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is
    ORDERED that Robin T. Browder is hereby suspended from the practice of
    law in the District of Columbia for the period of ninety days, execution suspended
    in favor of one year unsupervised probation on the condition that respondent is not
    the subject of another disciplinary complaint resulting in a finding that she violated
    disciplinary rules of any jurisdiction where she is licensed; promptly notifies
    Bar Counsel of any ethics complaint filed against her and its disposition; notifies
    Bar Counsel and the Board on Professional Responsibility, in writing, if and when
    she chooses to practice as an attorney representing clients; completes a continuing
    legal education course approved by Bar Counsel and provides proof of attendance
    within ten days of taking the course. However, if respondent fails to comply with
    any of the conditions and her probation is revoked, respondent shall be suspended
    for ninety days with the requirement to prove fitness as a condition to her
    reinstatement.
    So ordered.
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 15-BS-262

Citation Numbers: 115 A.3d 601

Filed Date: 6/4/2015

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023