Moorman v. Ciba-Geigy Corporation ( 2012 )


Menu:
  •                                                                                           FILED
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT                                APR 2 3 2012
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA                              us 0 .
    cClerk·tor the •strict. & 8ankruptcy
    ourts
    · · Oi t
    s net ot Columbia
    )
    Clinton Moorman,                             )
    )
    Plaintiff,                            )
    )
    V.                            )        Civil Action No.   12 0632
    )
    Ciba-Geigy Corp.,                            )
    )
    Defendant.                            )
    )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiffs pro se complaint and
    application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the in forma pauperis
    application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading
    requirements ofRule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
    Prose litigants must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,
    
    656 F. Supp. 237
    ,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires
    complaints to contain"( 1) a short and plain statement of the grounds for the court's jurisdiction
    [and] (2) a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief."
    Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 
    129 S.Ct. 1937
    , 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 
    355 F.3d 661
    ,668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair
    notice of the claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate
    defense and determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    ,498 (D.D.C. 1977).
    3
    Plaintiff is a resident of Orlando, Florida, suing a corporation. The complaint consists
    mostly of incoherent scribble and disjointed phrases, but plaintiff accuses defendant of attempted
    murder, "conspiracy to racial [sic] profile, discriminate and defraud me of my civil rights,"
    invasion of privacy, and numerous other misdeeds. Compl. at 15-16. The complaint is devoid of
    supporting facts and, therefore, fails to provide adequate notice of a claim. Furthermore, the
    basis of federal court jurisdiction is neither stated nor discerned. A separate Order of dismissal
    accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
    ---q:,
    Date: April _i!L_, 2012
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2012-0632

Judges: Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly

Filed Date: 4/23/2012

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014