Flynn v. Jmp Restoration Corp. ( 2010 )


Menu:
  •                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    ____________________________________
    )
    JOHN FLYNN, et al.,                  )
    )
    Plaintiffs,        )
    )
    v.                       )            Civil Action No. 10-0102 (ESH)
    )
    JMP RESTORATION CORP.,               )
    )
    Defendant.         )
    ____________________________________ )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for entry of default judgment. This case is an action
    for legal and equitable relief under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
    (“ERISA”), as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980, 
    29 U.S.C. § 1145
    . Defendant was served with the complaint on January 27, 2010, but has failed to answer
    or otherwise defend this action. The Clerk of Court entered default on April 20, 2010. Pursuant
    to the Court’s April 22, 2010 Order directing plaintiffs to move for entry of judgment, plaintiffs
    have moved for entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2).1/
    The determination of whether default judgment is appropriate is committed to the
    discretion of the trial court. Jackson v. Beech, 
    636 F.2d 831
    , 836 (D.C. Cir. 1980). For default
    judgment, defendant must be considered a “totally unresponsive” party and its default plainly
    willful, reflected by its failure to respond to the summons and complaint, the entry of default, or
    1/
    The Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (e)(1), and
    venue is proper under 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (e)(2). The Court has jurisdiction over defendant
    pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (e)(2) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(k)(1)(C).
    the motion for default judgment. Gutierrez v. Berg Contracting Inc., No. 99-3044, 
    2000 WL 331721
    , *1 (D.D.C. March 20, 2000) (citing Jackson, 
    636 F.2d at 836
    ). Given “the absence of
    any request to set aside the default or suggestion by the defendant that it has a meritorious
    defense,” it is clear that the standard for default judgment has been satisfied. 
    Id.
    Although the default establishes a defendant’s liability, the Court makes an independent
    determination of the sum to be awarded in the judgment unless the amount of damages is certain.
    Adkins v. Teseo, 
    180 F. Supp. 2d 15
    , 17 (D.D.C. 2001). Pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2), the
    Court shall award plaintiffs: (A) the unpaid contributions; (B) interest on the unpaid
    contributions; (C) liquidated damages in an amount equal to the greater of (i) interest on the
    unpaid contributions, or (ii) 20 percent (or such higher percentage as may be permitted under
    Federal or State law) of the amount determined by the court under subparagraph (A); (D)
    reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of the action, to be paid by the defendant; and (E) such other
    legal or equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. The Court may rely on detailed affidavits
    or documentary evidence to determine the appropriate sum for default judgment. Flynn v.
    Mastro Masonry Contractors, 
    237 F. Supp. 2d 66
    , 69 (D.D.C. 2002).
    Plaintiffs have filed the declarations of David F. Stupar, Executive Director of the
    Bricklayers & Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (“the Fund”), and Ira R. Mitzner, Esq.,
    in support of the motion for default judgment. Based on the declarations, the Court finds that
    plaintiffs have established damages in the amount of $13,839.99 in unpaid contributions to the
    Fund for work performed during the period May through October 2009, pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2)(A); $1,268.97 in interest on those unpaid contributions, pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2)(B); and $2,768.06 for liquidated damages assessed on unpaid contributions,
    2
    pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2)(C)(ii). In addition, plaintiffs are entitled to attorney’s fees in
    the amount of $1,452.50 and costs in the amount of $527.00, pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2)(D).
    Therefore, pursuant to 
    29 U.S.C. § 1132
    (g)(2), judgment will be entered for plaintiffs in
    the amount of $19,856.52. A separate Order of judgment will accompany this opinion.
    /s/
    ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE
    United States District Judge
    Date: April 23, 2010
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2010-0102

Judges: Judge Ellen S. Huvelle

Filed Date: 4/23/2010

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 10/30/2014