All Courts |
Federal Courts |
US Federal District Court Cases |
District Court, District of Columbia |
2010-04 |
-
FILED APR 2 0 2010 Clerk. U.S. District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Courts for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA John J. Serdar, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 10 0611 ) Sargent Industries Airight Div., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter comes before the Court on consideration of plaintiffs pro se complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Unlike state courts of general jurisdiction, federal district courts have limited jurisdiction. A federal district court has jurisdiction in civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. See
28 U.S.C. § 1331. Here, however, the complaint appears to arise from an industrial accident resulting in personal injury, which does not appear to implicate the Constitution, laws or treaties of the United States. A federal district court also has jurisdiction over civil actions in matters where the controversy exceeds $75,000 and where there is complete diversity of citizenship among the parties. See
28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Here, the plaintiff states no demand for damages and it appears that both the plaintiff and the defendant are citizens of the state of California. Therefore, both the threshold amount in controversy and complete diversity of citizenship among the parties are lacking. Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the complaint, without prejudice, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate order accompanies this memorandum opinion. Date: (~ ('/ 2.c f i)
Document Info
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2010-0611
Judges: Judge Reggie B. Walton
Filed Date: 4/20/2010
Precedential Status: Precedential
Modified Date: 10/30/2014