Kevin Rogers v. State , 488 S.W.3d 429 ( 2016 )


Menu:
  •                          COURT OF APPEALS
    SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS
    FORT WORTH
    NO. 02-14-00499-CR
    KEVIN ROGERS                                                        APPELLANT
    V.
    THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                        STATE
    ----------
    FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 2 OF TARRANT COUNTY
    TRIAL COURT NO. 1336215D
    ----------
    OPINION
    ----------
    After Appellant Kevin Rogers pled guilty to one count of aggravated
    robbery with a deadly weapon, the trial court found him guilty and sentenced him
    to twenty-five years’ confinement. In one issue, Appellant contends that the trial
    court abused its discretion and assessed a cruel and unusual punishment by
    sentencing him to twenty-five years’ confinement. We note that the sentence is
    well within the range of punishment Appellant faced—confinement for five to
    ninety-nine years or life plus a fine of up to $10,000.1 Appellant did not complain
    of the sentence in the trial court, and the State argues that he did not preserve
    his complaint for appeal. We agree.
    Appellant had ample opportunity to complain of the sentence in the trial
    court because the careful trial judge first stated, “I’m going to assess your
    punishment at 25 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of
    Criminal Justice,” and then immediately gave Appellant a chance to allocute,
    asking, “Any legal reason why I shouldn’t sentence him?”2 Appellant’s counsel
    answered, “No lawful reason, Your Honor.” The trial court then pronounced the
    sentence. Appellant filed no motion for new trial after the sentence was imposed.
    Because Appellant did not raise his sentencing complaint before the trial court
    despite the opportunity, he forfeited his complaint.3
    We overrule Appellant’s sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.
    1
    See Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.32, 29.03(b) (West 2011).
    2
    See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 42.07 (West 2006).
    3
    See Ziegler v. State, No. 02-14-00315-CR, 
    2015 WL 4077040
    , at *1 (Tex.
    App.—Fort Worth July 2, 2015, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
    publication); Alford v. State, No. 02-13-00058-CR, 
    2014 WL 3398187
    , at *5 (Tex.
    App.—Fort Worth July 10, 2014, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated for
    publication); Driggers v. State, Nos. 02-13-00123-CR, 02-13-00124-CR, 02-13-
    00125-CR, 
    2014 WL 2619379
    , at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth June 12, 2014, no
    pet.) (mem. op., not designated for publication).
    2
    /s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot
    LEE ANN DAUPHINOT
    JUSTICE
    PANEL: DAUPHINOT, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ.
    PUBLISH
    DELIVERED: April 7, 2016
    3
    

Document Info

Docket Number: 02-14-00499-CR

Citation Numbers: 488 S.W.3d 429

Filed Date: 4/7/2016

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023