Woubetu v. Catholic Charities ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                             UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    SAMSON WOUBETU,                               )
    )
    Plaintiff,                     )
    )
    v.                                     )         Civil Action No. 23-0946 (UNA)
    )
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES,                           )
    )
    Defendant.                     )
    MEMORANDUM OPINION
    This matter is before the Court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in
    forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court grants the application and, for the reasons
    discussed below, the dismisses the complaint.
    A pro se litigant’s pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to a
    formal pleading drafted by lawyer. See Haines v. Kerner, 
    404 U.S. 519
    , 520 (1972). Even pro
    se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch,
    
    656 F. Supp. 237
    , 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires
    that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s
    jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled
    to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The
    purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim
    being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense, and to
    determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 
    75 F.R.D. 497
    , 498
    (D.D.C. 1977).
    1
    Defendant operates a shelter in Washington, DC where plaintiff has been staying in
    recent months. See Compl. at 1. According to plaintiff, defendant’s staff “refuse to stop
    assaulting” him, take his books and other property, refuse to provide him a single room or
    apartment, and “insult and disrespect” him. 
    Id.
     Missing from the complaint is a statement
    establishing a basis for this Court’s jurisdiction. Furthermore, there are so few factual
    allegations that defendant cannot reasonably be expected to identify the claim or claims brought
    against it so that it may prepare a proper response.
    As drafted, the complaint fails to comply with the minimum pleading standard set forth in
    Rule 8(a) and, therefore, must be dismissed. A separate order will issue.
    /s/
    TANYA S. CHUTKAN
    DATE: April 12, 2023                                   United States District Judge
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2023-0946

Judges: Judge Tanya S. Chutkan

Filed Date: 4/12/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 4/13/2023