Grishau v. Mayorkas ( 2023 )


Menu:
  •                               UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
    VLADIMIR GRISHAU,
    Plaintiff,
    Civil Action No. 22-3695 (JDB)
    v.
    ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS ET AL.,
    Defendants.
    ORDER
    On December 9, 2022, plaintiff filed a petition for a writ of mandamus. Pet. for Writ of
    Mandamus & Declaratory J. [ECF No. 1]. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 20,
    2023. Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss [ECF No. 9]. Under the local rules, plaintiff had 14 days to respond
    to the motion. See D.C. Local Civ. R. 7(b). When an opposition “is not filed within the prescribed
    time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.” Id. Long after that 14-day deadline had passed,
    the Court offered plaintiff one last chance to “file any opposition to the motion to dismiss by not
    later than May 24, 2023, or the Court will grant the motion as unopposed.” May 10, 2023 Min.
    Order. Plaintiff did not file any opposition by that date.
    For these reasons, it is hereby
    ORDERED that [9] defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED as unopposed; it is
    further
    ORDERED that [1] plaintiff’s petition for a writ of mandamus and a declaratory judgment
    is dismissed.
    SO ORDERED.
    1
    /s/
    JOHN D. BATES
    United States District Judge
    Dated: May 30, 2023
    2
    

Document Info

Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2022-3695

Judges: Judge John D. Bates

Filed Date: 5/30/2023

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 5/30/2023