Joshua D. Nelson v. State of Florida , 235 So. 3d 308 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-939
    ____________
    JOSHUA D. NELSON,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    [January 31, 2018]
    PER CURIAM.
    We have for review Joshua D. Nelson’s appeal of the circuit court’s order
    denying Nelson’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure
    3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
    Nelson’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s
    decision in Hurst v. Florida, 
    136 S. Ct. 616
     (2016), and our decision on remand in
    Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
     (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
    (2017). This Court stayed Nelson’s appeal pending the disposition of Hitchcock v.
    State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017). After this
    Court decided Hitchcock, Nelson responded to this Court’s order to show cause
    arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Nelson’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Nelson is not entitled to relief.
    Nelson was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for
    death. Nelson v. State, 
    748 So. 2d 237
    , 240 (Fla. 1999). His sentence of death
    became final in 2000. Nelson v. Florida, 
    528 U.S. 1123
     (2000). Thus, Hurst does
    not apply retroactively to Nelson’s sentence of death. See Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at
    217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Nelson’s motion.
    The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Nelson, we
    caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
    ordered.
    LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
    LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
    PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
    I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
    v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
     (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
     (2017), is now
    final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
    opinion in Hitchcock.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Lee County,
    Joseph C. Fuller, Jr., Judge - Case No. 361995CF000911000ACH
    -2-
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida; and John
    Abatecola of John Abatecola, P.A., Estero, Florida,
    for Appellant
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Lisa Martin,
    Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida,
    for Appellee
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-939

Citation Numbers: 235 So. 3d 308

Filed Date: 1/31/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023