Paul Anthony Brown v. State of Florida , 237 So. 3d 924 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC17-2086
    ____________
    PAUL ANTHONY BROWN,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    [February 28, 2018]
    PER CURIAM.
    We have for review Paul Anthony Brown’s appeal of the circuit court’s
    order denying Brown’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
    Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
    Brown’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s
    decision in Hurst v. Florida, 
    136 S. Ct. 616
    (2016), and our decision on remand in
    Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
    (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
    (2017). After this Court decided Hitchcock v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
    (Fla.), cert.
    denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
    (2017), Brown responded to this Court’s order to show
    cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Brown’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Brown is not entitled to relief. Brown
    was sentenced to death following a jury’s unanimous recommendation for death.
    Brown v. State, 
    721 So. 2d 274
    , 276-77 (Fla. 1998). Brown’s sentence of death
    became final in 1999. Brown v. Florida, 
    526 U.S. 1102
    (1999). Thus, Hurst does
    not apply retroactively to Brown’s sentence of death. See 
    Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217
    . Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Brown’s motion.
    The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Brown, we
    caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
    ordered.
    LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion.
    LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result.
    PARIENTE, J., concurring in result.
    I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
    v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
    (Fla. 2017), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
    (2017), is now
    final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting
    opinion in Hitchcock.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Volusia County,
    Terence R. Perkins, Judge - Case No. 641992CF034756XXXAES
    Linda McDermott of McClain & McDermott, P.A., Estero, Florida,
    for Appellant
    -2-
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Doris Meacham,
    Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, Florida,
    for Appellee
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC17-2086

Citation Numbers: 237 So. 3d 924

Filed Date: 2/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023