James Aren Duckett v. State of Florida , 260 So. 3d 230 ( 2018 )


Menu:
  •           Supreme Court of Florida
    ____________
    No. SC18-1190
    ____________
    JAMES AREN DUCKETT,
    Appellant,
    vs.
    STATE OF FLORIDA,
    Appellee.
    December 28, 2018
    PER CURIAM.
    We have for review James Aren Duckett’s appeal of the postconviction
    court’s order denying Duckett’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal
    Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const.
    Duckett’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme
    Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida, 
    136 S. Ct. 616
    (2016), and our decision on
    remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 
    202 So. 3d 40
    (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, 
    137 S. Ct. 2161
    (2017). Duckett responded to this Court’s order to show cause arguing why
    Hitchcock v. State, 
    226 So. 3d 216
    (Fla.), cert. denied, 
    138 S. Ct. 513
    (2017),
    should not be dispositive in this case.
    After reviewing Duckett’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the
    State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Duckett is not entitled to relief.
    Duckett was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to death following the
    jury’s recommendation for death by a vote of eight to four, and his sentence of
    death became final in 1990. Duckett v. State, 
    568 So. 2d 891
    , 894 (Fla. 1990).
    Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Duckett’s sentence of death. See
    
    Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d at 217
    ; see also Foster v. State, No. SC18-860, 
    2018 WL 6379348
    , at *2-4 (Fla. Dec. 6, 2018) (explaining why the “elements of ‘capital
    first-degree murder’ ” argument derived from Hurst and the legislation
    implementing Hurst “has no merit”). Accordingly, we affirm the postconviction
    court’s order denying relief.
    It is so ordered.
    LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
    CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, J., concur in result.
    NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
    An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Lake County,
    William Gray Law, Jr., Judge - Case Nos. 351987CF001347AXXXXX &
    351988CF000262AXXXXX
    Mary Elizabeth Wells of the Law Office of M.E. Wells, Atlanta, Georgia; and
    Brittney Nicole Lacy, Staff Attorney, Office of Capital Collateral Regional
    Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,
    for Appellant
    -2-
    Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Leslie T. Campbell,
    Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, Florida,
    for Appellee
    -3-
    

Document Info

Docket Number: SC18-1190

Citation Numbers: 260 So. 3d 230

Filed Date: 12/28/2018

Precedential Status: Precedential

Modified Date: 1/12/2023