Manning v. State , 606 So. 2d 368 ( 1992 )

PER CURIAM.

We review State v. Manning, 595 So.2d 307 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), in which the court certified the same question answered by this Court in Scates v. State, 603 So.2d 504 (Fla.1992). Upon the authority of Scates, we answer the certified question in the affirmative. We quash the decision below and remand with directions to reinstate Manning’s probation.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.