M.H. v. State , 633 So. 2d 1067 ( 1994 )

PER CURIAM.

We review the decision of the district court of appeal in M.H. v. State, 622 So.2d 105 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993), on the ground of certified conflict. Art V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

On the authority of our recent decision in Brown v. State, 629 So.2d 841 (Fla.1994), we quash the decision under review and remand for proceedings consistent with our opinion in Brown.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur. MeDONALD, J., dissents.